Tracker12
Well-Known Member
Always been. fan of Barnes and Lehigh Defense bullets. How do the Hammers compare. Anyone have any field experience and input on there lethality.
Been shooting Barnes exclusively for 18 years. Not a bad thing to say about them and I've killed over 100 critters with them. Recently bought some of the Hammer HHT's for my 308 Win. I can say this, I've never shot a 100 yard group as small as I did with the Hammers. The group was .179" at 100 yards. Very little load development either. Took 12 shots to find that group and that was sighting my rifle in as well. So far I'm impressed but I'll know more about them this fall. Going to buy some Shock Hammer Bullets for my 45-70 soon as well. May pickup some more HHT's for my 6.5 CM to.
I'm going to try the 250 gr. bullets. Hoping to get around 2,800 fps with AA 1680. I'll be shooting them out of a CVA Scout.405 Shock Hammers are a touch heavy for the 45-70, they work but at 1800 fps at the muzzle the velocity is low enough that the petals don't shed.
View attachment 472553
I've used the hammers for the past few years and killed everything I've shot with them.
You'll need a rather long barrel to get anything close to 2,800 fps, IMO. I've shot 250gr monos with the Barnes max charge of AA1680 and got 2,330 (IIRC) from my 18.5" Marlin SBL.I'm going to try the 250 gr. bullets. Hoping to get around 2,800 fps with AA 1680. I'll be shooting them out of a CVA Scout.
Barnes load data must be off then.You'll need a rather long barrel to get anything close to 2,800 fps, IMO. I've shot 250gr monos with the Barnes max charge of AA1680 and got 2,330 (IIRC) from my 18.5" Marlin SBL.
I have also shot the 402gr ShockHammers at a MV of 1,700 fps and got complete petal separation and dispersal on a Maine bull moose. The core flew out the opposite side.
Were you using the load data for the Marlin's or the Ruger #1?I don't discount the Barnes data, I used it myself. But my experience implies that their velocity may be hard to obtain. I'd expect a velocity loss to be about 25 fps/per inch. MY barrel is 5.5" shorter than the barrel they used (24") but it doesn't explain the nearly 500fps difference that I saw. My loads were all shot over a LabRadar.
I'll post my results once I get them. Might be a month or so.I ran 57.5gr AA1680 in Starline cases with Federal 210M primers. Getting a velocity of 2,800 fps would be impressive. I hope that you can achieve your goal.
I was actually disappointed when I only got 2,330 fps, based on my expectations. But, the load kills whitetails quite effectively.
Good luck.
NI ran 57.5gr AA1680 in Starline cases with Federal 210M primers. Getting a velocity of 2,800 fps would be impressive. I hope that you can achieve your goal.
I was actually disappointed when I only got 2,330 fps, based on my expectations. But, the load kills whitetails quite effectively.
Good luck.
MY experience , is they are more accurate , don't foul , are very lethal , will give more vel with less pressure . HAMMER bullets have the best customer service you could possibly have and will help you with any question you have , with load development etc. STEVE one of HAMMER bullets owners is the go to guy to help you out with bullet choice proper twist rate etc. ONE main thing too remember make sure you remove any copper fouling from other bullets before load development with HAMMERS too reach their accuracy potential, good luck and good hunting.Always been. fan of Barnes and Lehigh Defense bullets. How do the Hammers compare. Anyone have any field experience and input on their lethality.