Engineering101
Well-Known Member
I discovered something that had not occurred to me in 50 years of hunting deer and other stuff. Basically the idea is this. If you use a bullet that will mushroom and still penetrate all the way through the animal (a Barnes TTSX for example) then the bigger the animal the harder they get hit.
In other words more kinetic energy gets dumped into an elk than into a deer. I suspect that this is not a linear effect since kinetic energy goes by the square of the velocity so a smaller animal is still going to get hit pretty hard. To test this theory and to assess meat damage I shot a relatively small Montana whitetail with my 338 RUM using the 210 Barnes TTSX. This deer was about 220 yards, muzzle velocity about 3,200 fps and velocity and energy at 220 yards was 2,860 fps and 3,820 ft lbs. Most people would say that 3,800 ft lbs is a wee bit of overkill for deer, however....
The deer hunched up, stumbled for about 20 yards and went down. This was a double lung broadside shot and there was not a scrap of meat damage. A 6X6 Blue Mtn elk at 348 yards with the same bullet did the same thing, again without a scrape of meat damage.
So now I'm thinking I've got the perfect deer (and everything else) rifle - as long as you use a Barnes or similar bullets. If you want a better BC, plug in the 280 grain LRX. Since there is no free lunch, there must be a downside of this approach but I haven't thought of it yet. Is there anyone else out there thinking they can shoot ANYTHING with their 338s?
In other words more kinetic energy gets dumped into an elk than into a deer. I suspect that this is not a linear effect since kinetic energy goes by the square of the velocity so a smaller animal is still going to get hit pretty hard. To test this theory and to assess meat damage I shot a relatively small Montana whitetail with my 338 RUM using the 210 Barnes TTSX. This deer was about 220 yards, muzzle velocity about 3,200 fps and velocity and energy at 220 yards was 2,860 fps and 3,820 ft lbs. Most people would say that 3,800 ft lbs is a wee bit of overkill for deer, however....
The deer hunched up, stumbled for about 20 yards and went down. This was a double lung broadside shot and there was not a scrap of meat damage. A 6X6 Blue Mtn elk at 348 yards with the same bullet did the same thing, again without a scrape of meat damage.
So now I'm thinking I've got the perfect deer (and everything else) rifle - as long as you use a Barnes or similar bullets. If you want a better BC, plug in the 280 grain LRX. Since there is no free lunch, there must be a downside of this approach but I haven't thought of it yet. Is there anyone else out there thinking they can shoot ANYTHING with their 338s?