h4350 is a good one
h4350 is a good one
IMR-4064. I used it regularly to load, .243, .30-06, .300 Savage, and 6.5 Arisaka. It did very well with all of those.
Also, one powder to rule them all only works if that powder is available. I had about 5 years when locating IMR 4350 was very difficult. It finally became more readily available around 2016. But from around 2011 until 2016, it was mostly hard to find, and I had to use other powders that were available. An example of this now is RL26 which I would like to try with the Speer and Sierra 200 grain hunting bullets in 30-06. But its currently hard to find. If I had to stay with one powder though, it would probably be IMR 4350.
I guess I should try H4350, but I regularly get groups under 1" from both my Ruger M77MKII and my O3-A3 with the IMR. RL 22 gave me 1.3 inch groups or a little larger. By the way, these are 5 shot groups with both powders. I've never noticed a temperature problem with IMR 4350, but there is some variations between lots it seems where Muzzle velocity with the same charges are concerned. I'm going to be experimenting with this powder and RL26 and Superformance with Sierra and Speer 200 grain bullets this summer/fall, and will let you know what I find out.I've used H-4350 a lot with the 30-06, with both 165-grain and 180-grain bullets. I have had better accuracy with H-4350 than with IMR-4350, but slightly better velocity with the IMR. There has been talk over the years about temperature sensitivity being less with the Hodgdon powder, but I had never had any trouble with that when I was using the IMR powder. Take your pick - neither flavor will disappoint you. Also, a buddy of mine had great results with RL-22 years ago, but he did have issues with temperature sensitivity. Maybe RL-23 is the cure for that. Don't know - haven't tried it. Good luck.
I guess I should try H4350, but I regularly get groups under 1" from both my Ruger M77MKII and my O3-A3 with the IMR. RL 22 gave me 1.3 inch groups or a little larger. By the way, these are 5 shot groups with both powders. I've never noticed a temperature problem with IMR 4350, but there is some variations between lots it seems where Muzzle velocity with the same charges are concerned. I'm going to be experimenting with this powder and RL26 and Superformance with Sierra and Speer 200 grain bullets this summer/fall, and will let you know what I find out.
Roger that. That's why I want to experiment with it a little. Speer lists it as getting 2670fps with the 200 grain hotcor and if I can get around 2625 or so, that's a very good medium long range 30-06 round.IMR4350 has worked good for me in the past shooting 200 Grain gamekings. Still A good powder for what I do. Just running with RL26 because of the extra speed I can get.
Roger that. That's why I want to experiment with it a little. Speer lists it as getting 2670fps with the 200 grain hotcor and if I can get around 2625 or so, that's a very good medium long range 30-06 round.
Both the Sierra and the Speer 200 grain bullets retain tremendous energy at distance, especially if you can launch them at around 2575 to 2650fps. It also shoots much flatter at distance, since the BC for the Sierra is about .545 and the Speer is around .50. When zeroed for 100 yards with a velocity of 2600fps and an altitude of around 8000 ft. the rounds match my Shepherd P2 scopes out to about 700 yards, within 1 moa of drop. No guesswork. IMR 4350 will get about 2600fps using Remington standard primers and a load of around 54 grains. At 400 yards, the bullets have over 1900 ft/lbs of energy and because of the mass of the projectiles, great penetration and energy transfer. I have both the new and older manuals, with the newer manuals reflecting the lawsuit fears of the publishers, so I tend to load from the older ones. A word of caution here-54 grains is 0.5 grains over the max in the newest manuals, while 56 grains is the max for IMR 4350 using 200 grain projectiles in manuals older than 5 0r 6 years.