How close are RL17 and H4350?

atl5029

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
158
Location
Dayton Ohio
I'm currently doing some looking into the best powders for the 338 RCM, and I am seeing a good bit about RL17. Problem is I can't find any right now. Last week I picked up some H4350 just because I know it is pretty versatile, and I see now that it is right next to RL17 on IMR's burn rate chart with H4350 being #124 and RL17 being #125. I'm curious to know if these two powders behave similarly in cartridges like the 338 RCM and if I could work up with H4350 from a start load of RL17. Thanks!

Also I'm all ears for powder suggestions for the 338 RCM. I have H4831SC, Varget, IMR3031, TAC, and the aforementioned H4350 that might make good candidates.
 
In what ways? I've never used either. Are starting charges similar? How interchangeable are they, if at all? Do they produce similar velocities?
Don't get me wrong as RL17 is a great powder but H4350 is one of the most versatile powders of all time as well as being super temp stable
 
In what ways? I've never used either. Are starting charges similar? How interchangeable are they, if at all? Do they produce similar velocities?
I've tried RL17 in several different calibers and it usually got better velo than H4350 but temp stability and group consistency results always went in favor of H4350.
 
Last edited:
Hornady manual

58706904-3D0D-46F6-A4F4-AB5F549BBF22.png

143B980C-5F37-41B1-A274-D3CABD665E51.png

41F89339-4286-44DD-A815-D518176DC52B.png
 
I bought two pounds of 17 at a local gunshop, price was right. The description was deceptive. "All weather conditions" verses temp insensitive. I bought a pound of 4350 two days ago for under 100 bucks.
 
Top