I have the 3200’s coming but at 3500 retail many won’t do it. For 1000 or less in a ballistics lrf the sig and Leica are the better or the options.Thanks guys, looks.like there are comparible options in small format. i have the sig 1600 i just picked up, but std range finder to replace an aging lecia. Leicas are best but spendy. looks like a 3500 is in my future. I will be rocking something new for long range work
How is the Sig 2400 working at longer ranges in it’s ability to get a range in very bright sunny conditions on a smaller target? I’ve been using a gen 1 G7. Great rangefinder but it struggled getting a range at 1345 this week. I am contemplating a new rangefinder compatible with the Kestrel 5700 AB. I’ll wait to see the BR4 before any decisions.
Another vote for Leicamy sig 2400abs , I think has hit at 1480 all the time . 1600 most of the time . it was able to range 2050 a time or two . 2375 never got a range . I have a gen 1 G7BR2 , I've never taken it along to compare with my Sig . C.O.shooter is going to get hooked up shooting with me and a couple other guys . I'm really anxious to see his 3500 in action .