Yeah, it would tell me to hold left of target at further distances. I just sight in left so I don't have to worry about it out to about 700 yards.Doesn't the Revic account for spin drift ?
I hear you, my newest car is a 2007 and most of my optics are worth more than it.
They aren't that loud in a normal circumstance, but my phone is right next to turret capturing maximum sound.MARCH scopes are excellent in design and quality BUT the noise from the turret "clicks" is jus too much. Another reason to opt for "Xmas tree" reticles so you don't have to dial.
Got my March F 3-24X52 in and mounted it in my 6.5 PRC. I know there is a lot of commotion about the "eye box" and the touchy parallax. I set the eye relief up while the scope was at 24X, as well as the focus, to take out any extra play. Once I had it set the right distance from my eye, anything from 3-20 power was a piece of cake to get a crisp image. Prone, freehand and kneeling. No issues at all. Above 20, it is more picky. But I feel it's blown way out of proportion, much like the NX8 eye box is. The parallax though… it's legit. It is a small range of motion to cover from 100 yards and further. But it's VERY EASY to get a crisp image and adjust out the parallax. It just isn't a huge range of motion. I also found that if I set it just below infinite, at about 10 power and below you hardly have to touch it between 100 & 500 yards. So basically any fast happening scenario, you really wouldn't have to touch it as long as you're not cranked to max power. Of course, if you want to run max power, you'll have to make adjustments for the image. But it's easy IMO. I used .87 seekins rings, and while the scope fit great, the front scope cap didn't have much clearance. So I sanded it down. So far, I think I'll like it. The center dot bigger than most reticles. Won't be an issue for a 700 yard hunting rifle though IMO.
View attachment 354681
View attachment 354682
Glad I'm not the only weird one here. Just don't tell my wife. That's why I had both made to look the same she won't notice the difference.I would like to point out that you have a $5k rifle/scope combo that's a back up rifle…lolz.
Yes for sure! I don't hunt under those scenarios, so I opted for non illuminated. But if you want a FFP scope and also hunt animals in dark shaded areas, I'd opt for illumination also.Great pics. This may have pushed me to go with the F instead of the compact. I still think illumination would be helpful for low power dark woods shooting. Thanks.