264 win mag for elk?

Our 7mm, 168 grain HVLD's @ 2,770 FPS and .270 WSM with, 140 Classic Hunters @ 3,150 FPS,.. better "Punch", bigger Holes than,.. .308 dia !
We're expecting, Mushy, 4 inch Diameter, Howitzer sized, Holes, thru the Heart / Lung area !
NO tracking, or having, to shoot an Elk,.. 5 Times,.. for us !
 
Our 7mm, 168 grain HVLD's @ 2,770 FPS and .270 WSM with, 140 Classic Hunters @ 3,150 FPS,.. better "Punch", bigger Holes than,.. .308 dia !
We're expecting, Mushy, 4 inch Diameter, Howitzer sized, Holes, thru the Heart / Lung area !
NO tracking, or having, to shoot an Elk,.. 5 Times,.. for us !
Our 7mm, 168 grain HVLD's @ 2,770 FPS and .270 WSM with, 140 Classic Hunters @ 3,150 FPS,.. better "Punch", bigger Holes than,.. .308 dia !
We're expecting, Mushy, 4 inch Diameter, Howitzer sized, Holes, thru the Heart / Lung area !
NO tracking, or having, to shoot an Elk,.. 5 Times,.. for us !
121 gr hammer hunter will be your ticket
 
Real good groups with the 130 gr accubonds, good with the140 SSTs and looking to test the 143 grain eld-x's again out of my 1:9 twist barrel. I found improved accuracy at 20 thousandths off the lands so I am going to give it a go with that on the 140s. 130/140 nosler accubonds hard to find right now...
 
Way back in the 60's - I had a buddy who not only hunted Elk with the trusty .264 - but he shot 1,000 yard targets. Now - he was a big guy - and it can kick a bit - but will do the job for sure.
 
Just like the title says is it a good choice. I know there are better bigger options but this is my rifle I am most familiar with.
Same as any other round. Put the bullet where it is supposed to be. They used to shoot giant bucks with a 32-20 lever action. You'll have plenty of gun.
Good Luck on the hunt !
 
Real good groups with the 130 gr accubonds, good with the140 SSTs and looking to test the 143 grain eld-x's again out of my 1:9 twist barrel. I found improved accuracy at 20 thousandths off the lands so I am going to give it a go with that on the 140s. 130/140 nosler accubonds hard to find right now...
How tight were your groups.
 
How tight were your groups.
the best group I had was the 130 accubonds at less than 1/2" at 100 yards (upper left on attached pic), the 140 SSTs are generally under 1" and the 143 gr eld-x's have been all over the place. Going to try another powder and closer to lands with them. Also, the 140 gr partitions group about MOA with this rifle.
 

Attachments

  • 20210622_201753.jpg
    20210622_201753.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 113
the best group I had was the 130 accubonds at less than 1/2" at 100 yards (upper left on attached pic), the 140 SSTs are generally under 1" and the 143 gr eld-x's have been all over the place. Going to try another powder and closer to lands with them. Also, the 140 gr partitions group about MOA with this rifle.
Good work,
 
I would not even consider the 156 Berger with a 1:9" twist. Berger states "1:8" minimum", minimum being key. There is a difference between "minimum" and "optimal". I run a 1:7.5" for the 156 in two rifles, and they are accurate as heck a LONG ways out there.

With a 1:9", I would be loading a 130-135 at blistering speeds. But, I would also not shoot this combo for elk. Deer and pronghorn slayer though.

Just my opinion.
Use a monolithic like barnes, no problem
 
No it will never work. Ignore all the Moose they kill in Europe with the 6.5x55.
Lol, spot on! Ive seen my dsughter kill lots of game elk size, with a 260 rem and barnes tsx bullets. Shoots through both shoulders of zebra, kudu, wildebeast, gemsbok and even eland.
 
Top