What Is The Best Hunting Cartridge To 500 yds.

Seems like a 140gr starting at 2700 fps might have 750 to 800 fpe at that range, I don't shoot one but there are a numbers that do that are available here, "what say them"? would everyone agrees or disagree that the percent of shots on Elk at that range with that type of energy without a vitals hit "would or would not" tip a big Bull over? Or would it have to be a spine of medulla oblongata shot :) just asking, I'm not trying to poke the Bear guys'..., Cheers.
 
This is the reason I seldom discuss anything on this forum anymore. So many know-it-all experts sitting on their computers chasing statistics they can use to imply that they have expertise in long range shooting.
One of you idiotically quoted the my bullet speed. The other quotes the shot placement I had to make. Maybe you need to learn about how barrel length changes muzzle velocities and how long was the barrel of the rifle in the quoted load? Also what altitude? So many variances from what you think you know just tells a person like me who has shot long range shots for years before you were born that you are a wannabe forum hugger, not a knowledgeable long range shooting expert!

Well....I don't spend a lot of time on a computer but I've seen an elk or 2 tip over in the last 45 years. Just wondering if your shot "folded him up in a heap" without hitting spine or brain. I think we can agree that even if your barrel was 30" and you were at 10,000 feet elevation, the bullet hit w less than 1000 fpe. It would be the first instant kill on an elk under those conditions I've ever heard of. Just wondering....
 
I posted the information about where I hit him earlier for your perusal. Never once did I say that I knocked him over or down. But I can assure you that his front legs were folded up under him. Maybe this doesn't meet your definition of "heap" but, it certainly meets mine.
 
Well....I don't spend a lot of time on a computer but I've seen an elk or 2 tip over in the last 45 years. Just wondering if your shot "folded him up in a heap" without hitting spine or brain. I think we can agree that even if your barrel was 30" and you were at 10,000 feet elevation, the bullet hit w less than 1000 fpe. It would be the first instant kill on an elk under those conditions I've ever heard of. Just wondering....
PM
 
I posted the information about where I hit him earlier for your perusal. Never once did I say that I knocked him over or down. But I can assure you that his front legs were folded up under him. Maybe this doesn't meet your definition of "heap" but, it certainly meets mine.
Additionally I never said he dropped instantly but apparently you weren't there to see so I wonder why you seem to think that it did. Apparently you aim for the head, yeh' right!
 
No, I took out the left ventricle and aorta while he grazed for a few seconds and dropped.
Nice shot. At that range, he probably didn't even notice the sound of the shot. And yes, all of the things you mentioned (altitude, barrel length and several other things have an effect on MV. I shoot a 35 Whelen, which I use to make shots to 700 yards, and I don't doubt there are those who would say its a bad round for distance, too. However, it hits like a hammer at distance, and makes an entrance hole that's about .37 caliber. Exit holes are much, much larger. And most animals won't react to the noise of a shot if they are at a distance. They don't attach it to danger. I've shot deer at 400 yards and more and had the herd just mill around or even run towards me and stop. If they don't see you or smell you, sometimes they'll just stand there and die without reacting to the sound or the hit. The sound comes significantly later than the hit and they don't make the connection. Again, good shot. But back to the question posed in this post, about best under 500 yards. I'd still go with the 30-06. Why? Because I just like the -06 for its combination of range, bullet weight, selection, availability, effectiveness, versitility and penetration with the heavier bullets. Oh, and I just like the -06 because.
 
This is the reason I seldom discuss anything on this forum anymore. So many know-it-all experts sitting on their computers chasing statistics they can use to imply that they have expertise in long range shooting.
One of you idiotically quoted the my bullet speed. The other quotes the shot placement I had to make. Maybe you need to learn about how barrel length changes muzzle velocities and how long was the barrel of the rifle in the quoted load? Also what altitude? So many variances from what you think you know just tells a person like me who has shot long range shots for years before you were born that you are a wannabe forum hugger, not a knowledgeable long range shooting expert!

I'm not seeing where anyone quoted "your" bullet velocity, I see "a" velocity which was stated by me with roughly the "energy" for that velocity and bullet weight. I personally wasn't talking about variances for one reason, it was a simple question on a simple subject, and no one had to reinvent the wheel over it. Not sure why you're standing so close to the fire over this, but in my case, I can assure you I have more time on the trigger than you can imagine in many different fields'..., work and sports; as a former Swat Counter Sniper and LEO State Sniper Instructor, Army B-11 and E7 type Drill Sgt, NRA high power shooter, National, and International, just responding to your statement, and there are members on this forum who can verify it, and "YOU Sir?" Why don't you include your aforementioned point(s) in the post that you are referring to that way no will "have to"... second guess'..., you as you've clearly expressed. Sorry, that you're having a bad day over this perhaps things will get better.
 
Last edited:
Nice shot. At that range, he probably didn't even notice the sound of the shot. And yes, all of the things you mentioned (altitude, barrel length and several other things have an effect on MV. I shoot a 35 Whelen, which I use to make shots to 700 yards, and I don't doubt there are those who would say its a bad round for distance, too. However, it hits like a hammer at distance, and makes an entrance hole that's about .37 caliber. Exit holes are much, much larger. And most animals won't react to the noise of a shot if they are at a distance. They don't attach it to danger. I've shot deer at 400 yards and more and had the herd just mill around or even run towards me and stop. If they don't see you or smell you, sometimes they'll just stand there and die without reacting to the sound or the hit. The sound comes significantly later than the hit and they don't make the connection. Again, good shot. But back to the question posed in this post, about best under 500 yards. I'd still go with the 30-06. Why? Because I just like the -06 for its combination of range, bullet weight, selection, availability, effectiveness, versitility and penetration with the heavier bullets. Oh, and I just like the -06 because.

isn't the Whelen just a bit better?
 
IMG_7547.JPG
this is what I see when guys argue about the magical powers of the creed

will never understand what makes dudes actually believe that a 52 gr h20 capacity pipsqueak of a cartridge is some sort of deathray, there are larger capacity 6.5's around but no.... the creed will surely outperform them
 
isn't the Whelen just a bit better?
Isn't it just. It hits like a freight train with either the Sierra Gameking 225 grain or the Speer 250 grain Hotcor. MV is 2725-2750 for the Sierra, and 2675-2685 for the Hotcor. ME is 3600 to 4000ftlbs and it scores a 35 or so on the Taylor Knock out scale. Entrance wounds are large, exit wounds are enormous, and it hits with the energy of a 44 magnum at the muzzle at 1,000 yards. Any chest cavity hit with the Whelen creates a large exit wound (silver dollar or bigger) at any distance under 700 yards, and results in collapsed lungs within about 30 yards at most or DRT when hit. Its a serious round, and right on the edge of being an African Dangerous Game round. The down side is that it generates quite a bit of recoil. It kicks about as much as a .300 Weatherby, or maybe a little more. But I seldom have to blood trail any animal when it is hit in the chest. And then, only for a short distance. Its also a really good bear and moose round. But for the purpose of this thread, I wouldn't suggest the Whelen. It recoils too much for most people, and ammo is almost a strict hand loading proposition. I'd still suggest either the 280/280AI or the 30-06.
 
Well....I don't spend a lot of time on a computer but I've seen an elk or 2 tip over in the last 45 years. Just wondering if your shot "folded him up in a heap" without hitting spine or brain. I think we can agree that even if your barrel was 30" and you were at 10,000 feet elevation, the bullet hit w less than 1000 fpe. It would be the first instant kill on an elk under those conditions I've ever heard of. Just wondering....
I think energy needed to kill deer and elk is way overstated. If you shoved a 9mm up against an elk or deer and put it in the vitals would it die? A 9mm has about 350ft lbs at the muzzle. We've killed elk with a lot less energy than 1000ft lbs.
 
Given the number of 7-08 fans posting I am wondering why nobody has said a word about a 7x57 Mauser. If one is using this round in a modern action (Mauser 98, 03 Springfield, Rem 700 Model 70 win Howa Tika CZ etc), it can be loaded do everything the 7-08 will do and possibly more. I certainly would not recommend loading this cartridge hot in any pre 98 mauser action but if the action will take 06 or 270 pressures why not the 7x57 vs the 7-08?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top