Never use a SAFETY

Dumb question...you guys have me all worried now. When I am stalking I have a round chambered with the bolt lifted and some brass exposed on my Remington 700 with the safety on. I thought this was safe, but now Im questioning this tactic. Another question when I am in a box blind I have a round chambered with the safety on, bolt lifted again, with the rifle pointed out of the blind so that way im not fumbling around with a loaded rifle and its pointed in a safe direction. Is this safe? Should I change my tactics to just chambering a round when I am ready to fire? This sounds like a newb question, but I am always ready to eat humble pie. Thanks gents.
It's completely safe when carried in such a manner but I wouldn't do it. Too easy for crap to get in the action or for it to fall completely open losing your half chambered round while you are walking.

I carry one in the tube and a full mag, weapon on safe and check frequently when I'm moving around to ensure it's still on safe.
 
It's completely safe when carried in such a manner but I wouldn't do it. Too easy for crap to get in the action or for it to fall completely open losing your half chambered round while you are walking.

I carry one in the tube and a full mag, weapon on safe and check frequently when I'm moving around to ensure it's still on safe.

Same here Wildrose.......
 
Dumb question...you guys have me all worried now. When I am stalking I have a round chambered with the bolt lifted and some brass exposed on my Remington 700 with the safety on. I thought this was safe, but now Im questioning this tactic. Another question when I am in a box blind I have a round chambered with the safety on, bolt lifted again, with the rifle pointed out of the blind so that way im not fumbling around with a loaded rifle and its pointed in a safe direction. Is this safe? Should I change my tactics to just chambering a round when I am ready to fire? This sounds like a newb question, but I am always ready to eat humble pie. Thanks gents.

Mechanically it is safe when the bolt is lifted. Most modern bolt actions cock the striker as the bolt handle is being lifted, so when the handle is up the cocking cam is physically preventing forward movement of the firingpin/striker assembly. The question is why do you want to do this- leaving your bolt unlocked makes the rifle safe but allows the possibility of other problems: if you move the rifle the bolt could fall all the way open and your cartridge is falling free to wherever, the bolt could make a metal on metal sound way louder than the click of releasing the safety should be. You could get debris in the action if you are walking with the rifle in this condition. Worst case scenario, you get where you intend to shoot from and you have no bolt (some bolt-releases move easier than others). If you don't like walking with a loaded chamber, then lock the bolt on an empty chamber and cycle the bolt when its time to aim. When my rifle is in my pack scabbard the chamber is empty, magazine full. If I am walking in reasonable terrain, the chamber is loaded, safety engaged. If I come to an obstacle requiring climbing or any other awkward movement, the round comes out of the chamber until past the problem. These principles were taught to me so long ago I can't recall how young I was at the time, nor who taught me- was it Dad, Gramp, or the father of one of my friends? Whoever is responsible told us all: know how your rifle functions mechanically speaking, and make checking the condition of chamber/safety/magazine etc. an automatic reflex any and every time your circumstances change in the field. At the range, the people I am willing to shoot with all keep the bolt open when not actually aiming and firing, as a courtesy to each other so we can see at a glance that the rifles are clear and safe when our hands aren't actually on them. "Accidental" shootings often happen with guns everyone "knew" were empty....
 
Okay, I watched the video. Why are we giving audience to MSNBC here? They and many other major media outlets are staunchly anti-gun/anti-second amendment/anti-hunting/anti-self defense. The Remington trigger "issue" has been exploited by all the anti-s as much as possible for years. All appropriate sympathies to all those injured and the families of those who were killed in these incidents- any death or injury is terrible to contemplate. However- the number one safety rule of gun handling is and always has been: always make certain your muzzle is pointed in a safe direction. For anyone or anything to take a bullet, they had to be in front of the muzzle. How they got there is something we all need to think about EVERY time we put our hands on any firearm, or any other "projectile device". I am NOT criticizing anyone who has had the misfortune to be involved in any of these incidents, please do not take this that way. I am merely reminding all my fellow gun-enthusiasts: when the gun is in your hands, so is the responsibility for the outcome.
 
Okay, I watched the video. Why are we giving audience to MSNBC here? They and many other major media outlets are staunchly anti-gun/anti-second amendment/anti-hunting/anti-self defense. The Remington trigger "issue" has been exploited by all the anti-s as much as possible for years. All appropriate sympathies to all those injured and the families of those who were killed in these incidents- any death or injury is terrible to contemplate. However- the number one safety rule of gun handling is and always has been: always make certain your muzzle is pointed in a safe direction. For anyone or anything to take a bullet, they had to be in front of the muzzle. How they got there is something we all need to think about EVERY time we put our hands on any firearm, or any other "projectile device". I am NOT criticizing anyone who has had the misfortune to be involved in any of these incidents, please do not take this that way. I am merely reminding all my fellow gun-enthusiasts: when the gun is in your hands, so is the responsibility for the outcome.

This huge recall has nothing to do with the media! The fact is that the rifles have been going off for 6+ decades since they first starting manufacturing them. The inventor himself, Mike Walker, told them they needed to make a fix that would cost 5 cents a rifle and they have never done it. There have been thousands of misfires besides those that resulted in injury and death and Remington is finally going to fix the problem that they should have many moons ago. I wish people that obviously haven't looked into the problem would not spout off like you did because people that own those rifles can read the comments and then not listen to what the true cause of the problem is. Yes, safety and proper gun handling is paramount for everyone. However, they should never have to worry about their firearm not being properly built and possibly going off when it's not supposed to and that's what's been happening with many of these rifles for many years. A number of the injuries caused by the defect were from ricochets when the rifle was pointed in a safe direction when they went off, so please don't blame it all on mishandling of them!
 
Spout off? I am merely reminding everyone to follow safety rules which MAY have helped to avoid or lessen the severity of the injuries that have occurred. Personally, I don't care for a two-position safety, I like one that permits unloading the rifle with the safety engaged. I am also fully aware that the safety on my favorite rifles DOESN'T BLOCK THE SEAR, ONLY THE TRIGGER, so it is theoretically possible for the sear to be released through excess dirt/debris accumulation, OR if the rifle is dropped and/or subjected to a hard impact. It is up to me to control my muzzle at all times. Easy there Topgun....
 
Spout off? I am merely reminding everyone to follow safety rules which MAY have helped to avoid or lessen the severity of the injuries that have occurred. Personally, I don't care for a two-position safety, I like one that permits unloading the rifle with the safety engaged. I am also fully aware that the safety on my favorite rifles DOESN'T BLOCK THE SEAR, ONLY THE TRIGGER, so it is theoretically possible for the sear to be released through excess dirt/debris accumulation, OR if the rifle is dropped and/or subjected to a hard impact. It is up to me to control my muzzle at all times. Easy there Topgun....

Your post upset me because it was very similar to ones I've read regarding this problem the last few years where you focused mainly on the media and safe handling, the latter of which I commented and agree on. This, IMHO puts the real problem in the background and may make people continue to say it hasn't happened to them and never will. However, it doesn't matter if you have those rifles pointed in what you think is a safe direction and away from someone like you were so adamantly saying that caused all the accidents because if they go off and there is a ricochet like I mentioned someone can still be injured or killed. This is not a "keep your finger off the trigger " issue!
 
It's completely safe when carried in such a manner but I wouldn't do it. Too easy for crap to get in the action or for it to fall completely open losing your half chambered round while you are walking.

I carry one in the tube and a full mag, weapon on safe and check frequently when I'm moving around to ensure it's still on safe.
That is how I do it. I use it the way it was designed to be used. It seems so strange that I'm apparently in the minority. :/
 
Your post upset me because it was very similar to ones I've read regarding this problem the last few years where you focused mainly on the media and safe handling, the latter of which I commented and agree on. This, IMHO puts the real problem in the background and may make people continue to say it hasn't happened to them and never will. However, it doesn't matter if you have those rifles pointed in what you think is a safe direction and away from someone like you were so adamantly saying that caused all the accidents because if they go off and there is a ricochet like I mentioned someone can still be injured or killed. This is not a "keep your finger off the trigger " issue!

It was not my objective to upset you or anyone else, so please accept my apology for having done so. As far as the "it hasn't happened to you" issue- it actually has happened- six feet from me, but with a different type of rifle. Upon returning to camp at the end of the day, a group of us had all come out of the woods at about the same time and stopped to unload the rifles before approaching the cabin. We all, from long ingrained habit, faced out (we were standing in a rough semi-circle), pointed our muzzles at the ground, and when one of the fellows released his safety to unlock his bolt- BANG. Of course we were all surprised. None more than he was. I was 13 at the time, the man whose rifle fired was in his 30s, his father, also in the circle was in his 60s. When the shock wore off, Dave turned to his Dad and hugged him hard, saying "thank you so much for always making me watch my muzzle". When they took the rifle to a gunsmith after the long ride home, he found that accumulated gunk had gotten on the mating surfaces of the trigger and sear, from the lubrication these gents liked to use on their rifles. Trigger mechanisms should be run "dry" for just this reason. If a safety is of a type which allows the trigger to move freely when the safety is engaged, then it is possible for the user to inadvertently pull the trigger while on safe, and some tiny or not so tiny piece of debris to fall between the trigger and the sear, preventing proper trigger re-set, and when the safety is released later, it (the safety) becomes, in effect, the trigger. I have looked into the Remington "Walker" trigger issue because I own a 700. In all their testing, Remington was never able to re-create an accidental discharge with a clean, properly adjusted (correct sear engagement) trigger. I still don't like two-position safeties. Ruger's M77 Mark 2 safety locks the trigger by putting solid steel under the trigger bar so tightly that the sear bar cannot get away from the striker ramp surface. That's a SAFETY in my opinion. I run Savages with RifleBasix SAV2 triggers. The safety blocks the trigger, but it is a two lever trigger and the lever that actually holds the sear is NOT locked mechanically. I have dropped these rifles on their butt pads fairly hard, and not had a release, but I never forget how they work, and I know in the back of my mind that there is a tiny possibility that it could happen. RifleBasix adamantly warns the buyer NEVER TRUST THE SAFETY.

The OP of this thread described a method of handling a bolt-action rifle that is, to me and apparently everyone else who responded, UNSAFE. While there are many subscribers to this site who are heavily into the mechanical aspects of their rifles, there are also probably plenty of shooters, both long time and newcomers, who have never taken a rifle apart or really know what "makes the darn thing tick". I have written my responses to this thread with those folks in mind, hoping to provide some insight as to how to be "safe-er" when handling firearms. If you shoot enough, just like if you drive enough, you will see some accidents. The point here is to learn from those mistakes, regardless of who made them, and avoid repeating them. For those who want more information on the Remington trigger issue, I recommend 8541Tactical on youtube. He goes into the differences between all the currently available Remington triggers, the function of the Walker unit, and the recall.
 
Thanks 7Mag, as I really appreciate your follow-up post. As you stated, I also am most worried about people that barely know how to load and unload their rifle and they are out there. I was out at a range on assignment one day helping people sight their guns in for deer season. One guy had a Remington semi, as I recall it, and one of the other guys helping him get it tuned told me the owner flat out asked him how to unload it without shooting all the rounds so he didn't waste a lot of ammo---yikes!!!
 
I am 64 years ole and grew up in the home of a gun smith, (my dad). There were guns all over our house and all were loaded. There is only one gun that is unloaded and that is the gun you have torn down and now hold the firing pin in your hand. The safety built into each firearm is there for a reason. I always hunt with a bullet in the chamber and the safety on. Why else would there be one on the gun. Reading this thread will make me question others around me even more now if they carry a firearm. gun)
 
I am 64 years ole and grew up in the home of a gun smith, (my dad). There were guns all over our house and all were loaded. There is only one gun that is unloaded and that is the gun you have torn down and now hold the firing pin in your hand. The safety built into each firearm is there for a reason. I always hunt with a bullet in the chamber and the safety on. Why else would there be one on the gun. Reading this thread will make me question others around me even more now if they carry a firearm. gun)

I was always taught never trust a safety. There are other ways to mitigate it of course, like no round in the chamber, finger off the trigger, and point the rifle in a safe direction. Also, Wildrose and anyone else who answered my question, thank you. And lastly Remington's rule! Screw the news! :)
 
I was always taught never trust a safety. There are other ways to mitigate it of course, like no round in the chamber, finger off the trigger, and point the rifle in a safe direction. Also, Wildrose and anyone else who answered my question, thank you. And lastly Remington's rule! Screw the news! :)

That has to be right up there with the stupid way the OP handles his firearm! The inventor of the trigger himself said that it's defective and needed to be replaced and you come up with that comment---Another YIKES for you!!!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top