Marine sniper
Well-Known Member
Looking to shoot 300 grain bullets.
Thanks,
John
Thanks,
John
Have never tried retumbo so for myself I can't compare - for the same reason though, when I wanted to try retumbo I couldn't find it so I did some research and ended up "settling" with 8133. Not going to bother messing with anything else now, printed a legit one hole group at 100 yards with 225 eld m bullets (hbn treated, Winchester brass, fed 215m) with a compressed load of 79 grains, mv 2760 or so (3750 foot pounds) so not a barn burner but not sluggish, right what you'd expect from a .300 win mag.Which powder were you able to get more velocity with?
Thanks for the tip
Ooh yes I'm intrigued about that one as well but haven't seen it around yet. Isn't that a ball powder? I'm always a bit untrusting of ball powderstake a look at the ramshot lrt
yes it is a ball powder I am trying it in a 6.5-280 ackley with 156 bergers and getting good velocity with it don't know much about the temp stability yetOoh yes I'm intrigued about that one as well but haven't seen it around yet. Isn't that a ball powder? I'm always a bit untrusting of ball powders
RE 33 is too slow for this rifles short barrel. I have tried it.
Consistency trumps velocity and h1000 is consistent if anything. Supposed to be temp stable as well, more than retumbo. Haven't tested that for myself yet. Found out the hard way early in my loading career that Rl22 is about the most sensitive powder there is!I plan on trying some H1000. I have 3 pounds in storage.