RockyMtnUT
Well-Known Member
.
Last edited:
What would you say killed this pronghorn?This whole notion of "shock" killing an animal is absolute BS.
Show me a proven example of an animal being hit No where near the CNS, say in the rear ham, that instantly DIED.
I have literally removed a good portion of a deers hind quarter and the animal was still able to run.
Bullets kill by displacing tissue by the action of cavitation as they expand through those tissues, watch some slow mo of ballistic gel tests, the cavitation expands the tissue then falls back on itself.
Shock itself doesn't kill, but the damage to blood vessels and organs, including the CNS if near enough, is what kills.
Sure, small animals appear to be killed by being blown apart, but that is totally different than shooting a buffalo.
Cheers.
What would you say killed this pronghorn?
Only two options for a kill like that…I would hazard to guess that a bullet killed him.
Obviously a Creedmoor. It's very efficient.Only two options for a kill like that…
A Christensen arms 7mm
Or
A Creedmoor!!
What would you say killed this pronghorn?
I've seen a 7mm rem mag with a 140gr class bullet light switch a deer hit in the hind quarter. That bullet was cruising, and didn't exit. Deer bang/flopped just like the pronghorn above. I'd submit that is a strange and unusual result... but I can't explain it any other way than shock.
Nothing hit the spinal column. Bullet passed through both lungs just above the heart.Without an investigation into the animals body cavity/spine then it is speculation.
Have seen a similar result at between 400-500mtr on a small fallow deer….the resultant kill was from a piece of jacket that penetrated the spinal cord and another that sliced the abdominal arteries.
Shock was not the cause.
Cheers.
That's what I'm assuming. But since the OP hasn't been on since yesterday it's only an assumption. I don't want to quote Samuel L. Jackson about "assumptions".If guys actually read the article I believe the OP is referring to it would make a whole lot more sense. I'm assuming it's this one by Nathan Foster?
Effective Game Killing
Effective game killing- How bullets kill and where to aim to ensure a fast clean kill.www.ballisticstudies.com
That's what I'm assuming. But since the OP hasn't been on since yesterday it's only an assumption. I don't want to quote Samuel L. Jackson about "assumptions".
I center ribbed an 1,100lb brown bear, broadside, just behind both shoulder muscles. The boar collapsed, and never so much as a quiver. Never saw a muscle twitch.This whole notion of "shock" killing an animal is absolute BS.
Show me a proven example of an animal being hit No where near the CNS, say in the rear ham, that instantly DIED.
I have literally removed a good portion of a deers hind quarter and the animal was still able to run.
Bullets kill by displacing tissue by the action of cavitation as they expand through those tissues, watch some slow mo of ballistic gel tests, the cavitation expands the tissue then falls back on itself.
Shock itself doesn't kill, but the damage to blood vessels and organs, including the CNS if near enough, is what kills.
Sure, small animals appear to be killed by being blown apart, but that is totally different than shooting a buffalo.
Cheers.