• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Load for Cooper model 22 6.5x284

ust421

Active Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
26
Location
Bagley, MN
Just looking to see what everyone is useing to get a good base start I am starting with 51 grains with the bullet being .01 off the lands. Did shoot a load of 51.5 and seemed a little tighter, But was just seeing what everyone is shooting.gun)

Berger vld 140 hunting
4831sc
Lapua brass

Thanks
 
You started where I ended up. I could eek out a little more velocity but my groups got a little bigger. I figured I could live with 1/4-1/2 MOA and a little less velocity. I was right at 2890 fps.
 
I have gotten good results using 53gr of H4831sc, Fed 210M primers, Lapua brass, 140 Bergers. My Cooper and Savage both like the bullet seated .075" off the lands. I get 2940FPS. Using 57.5 gr of Retumbo and Fed215's gives equivalent accuracy and 2980 FPS. Temperature stability with both powders is excellent.
 
Just last weekend I tried the 140gn A-Max ahead of 59gns of Retumbo, in Lapua brass, lit by CCI BR2's. In my heavy barreled Savage this load shot on hole at 100yds @ 3038fps. At 700yds it shot 3-3.5" groups. It was 90* and there was extreme mirage that day so I may be able squeeze a bit more accuracy out of it on a cooler day. JohnnyK.
 
Here is what I shot the other day. I think I can get them tighter. 100yds
 

Attachments

  • IMAG1636.jpg
    IMAG1636.jpg
    67.3 KB · Views: 122
  • IMAG1638.jpg
    IMAG1638.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 127
  • IMAG1637.jpg
    IMAG1637.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 126
Here is what I shot the other day. I think I can get them tighter. 100yds

You might try varying seating depth. My groups varied from .75-.25 MOA between .010" and .075" off the lands with the 140 VLD's. My .25MOA groups were very consistent at .075" off the lands in my Cooper.
 
The barrel was a little warmer with the .081 off.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG1639.jpg
    IMAG1639.jpg
    110.1 KB · Views: 118
  • IMAG1640.jpg
    IMAG1640.jpg
    122.4 KB · Views: 158
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top