Ballistics Question

jeffro

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
197
Im dialing in a few guns for long range shooting. I have a CED crony. Im taking my vel, and putting it into JBM. Im using thier BC for the bullets. All the temps, bar, Hum, and alt are correct. When I get out too 700 to 800 yrds and beyond, the charts are off by a little bit. .5 MOA at the most. Im wondering what others do to tune thier charts. Do you adjust your bullet speed or the BC of the bullet.

Thanks.
 

BryanLitz

<b>Official LRH Sponsor</b>
Joined
Mar 8, 2007
Messages
633
Jeffro,
The most common reason for 'observed' trajectories being different than 'calculated' trajectories (assuming of course that the inputs to the calculation are truly accurate) is sight adjustments.

Most shooters take for granted that when they dial 30 MOA on their turret that the crosshairs actually move 30.00 MOA. However, in many cases, the crosshairs don't move exactly as advertised. You're very likely to get +/- 1/2 MOA or more error when you make large sight adjustments. This results in the bullet striking somewhere other than you're point of aim, but it doesn't necessarily mean the bullet's trajectory was off from the calculation, maybe your point of aim is off from where you think it should be.

One easy way to test for this is to set up a 'tall target' at 100 yards. Put an aimpoint at the bottom of the target and shoot a group at your 100 yard zero. Then move your scope up 20 or 30 MOA and shoot another group. Measure the distance between the two groups and see if the point of aim actually moved exactly according to your adjustment. If not, you can calculate a 'calibration factor' to apply to your sight adjustments.

The 'tall target test' is also a good way to insure if your scopes vertical adjustment is tracking perfectly vertical. Draw a line on the target using a plumb line or level, then see if your vertical adjustment produces two groups that are parallel to the line.

Some scopes are right on the money with their adjustments, some can be off by more than 10% (meaning a 20 MOA adjustment would actually move 18 or 22 MOA). I believe this is the most likely cause of your perceived error.

Another thought, what bullets and BC's are you using from JBM? Some of the BC's in that library are more accurate than others.

-Bryan
 

jeffro

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
197
The bullets that Im using are.

Horn- .308 168 Amax
.308 208 Amax
.284 162 Amax

Nosler .308 168 CustomCom Match
 

BryanLitz

<b>Official LRH Sponsor</b>
Joined
Mar 8, 2007
Messages
633
jeffro,
Each of the bullets you mentioned is available in the JBM library with a 'Litz' measured BC. When you choose that bullet, the measured G7 BC for that bullet is loaded which, next to doplar radar data, is the most accurate and best fitting BC for long range bullets.

My measured BC's are typically good enough to predict trajectories with less than .5 MOA of error out to 700/800 yards. I suspect the ~.5 MOA error you're seeing is mostly due to imperfections in scope adjustment, or uncertainties in some of the other inputs.

How many shots are you shooting to determine the group center in relation to your aim point?

To put it in perspective, .5 MOA error in predicted drop isn't very bad at 700/800 yards.

It would only take a 2.5% calibration error in your scope's reticle movement to create the .5 MOA error at 800 yards. If you dial 20 MOA and the scope moves 19.5 or 20.5 MOA, you should be able to detect that with the 'tall target' test.

To answer your original question: how to fix it?...
There's no easy way in JBM. Let's say you do the tall target test and find that your reticle moves .256 MOA per click instead of .250 MOA per click. You would have to manually convert the drop table from inches to clicks based on the correction factor that's specific to your scope. This can be done in a spreadsheet.

Just to cover this base; are you using the correct click value in JBM? If you selected 1/4" clicks vs 1/4 MOA clicks (or vice versa) that would be more than enough to cause your perceived .5 MOA error at 800 yards.

-Bryan
 

Ridge Runner

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2002
Messages
987
Location
mathias wv
If your good to 700 yards its probably a BC issue, change the BC on JBM until your charts match your trajectory, it works for me.
RR
 

Eaglet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
2,779
Location
Nevada
Jeffro,

Do your self a favor, follow everything bsl135 is advising and if that doesn't

work then follow what RR is saying. :)

Regards,
 

jeffro

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
197
Thanks for all your help. I will look into all of this.
 

Trending threads

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top