1:8" for 300WM: Is this too fast?

FEENIX

Well-Known Member
LRH Team Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
12,885
Location
Great Falls, MT
Sorry, but this is bugging the heck out of me:) I don't know why you again insist on this being a fad. As stated by several people, it was never a fad, and was in fact the exact opposite of a fad. It was a proven military round that people trusted their life with.

Also, just because something is new does not mean it is a fad.

Here's a definition of Fad: an intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, especially one that is short-lived and without basis in the object's qualities; a craze.
No one is disputing that they are a proven military round.

How do you know it is never a fad? According to Wikipedia (non-peer-viewed or empirical source) ...

"A fad, trend, or craze is ANY form of COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR that develops within a CULTURE, a GENERATION or SOCIAL GROUP in which a group of people enthusiastically follow an IMPULSE for a finite period."

"Fads often result from an activity or behavior being PERCEIVED as EMOTIONALLY POPULAR or EXCITING within a PEER GROUP, or being deemed "COOL" as often promoted by SOCIAL NETWORKS. A fad is said to "catch on" when the number of people adopting it begins to increase to the point of being noteworthy. Fads often fade quickly when the perception of novelty is gone."

What is considered short-lived? The 6.5 CM was considered a fad since its inception in 2008. Nearly 12 years later, it remains as a fad according to social group/network and per the definition above. As I previously noted ...

Fads, trends, or craze are a matter of perspective and it is cyclical
 

David Lindler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2018
Messages
152
Location
south carloina
Hello all,

I'm eyeing the X-Bolt Stalker LR in 300WM for my hunting rifle. It has a 26" barrel with a 1:8" twist. I'm looking to shoot around the 200g mark with Accubonds. However, I'm curious... is this too fast of a twist for 200s? If not, what's the lightest/heaviest I could shoot without under/over stabilizing
U can't "over stabilize."
1:8 would be good for longer heavier bullets.
 

TXAoudadKlr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
1,454
Location
Houston,TX
I had my 300AX built with a 1-10 back in 2015. I’ve been kicking myself in the rear ever since for not doing a 1-9 or faster. I really like the 214 hammer but I have nowhere near the twist for it.

Nemo and Falkor use 1-8’s in their 300WM ar’s

I did select a 1-8.5 for my 300 Raptor just because the velocity it will generate with even the heaviest bullets out. A tamer chambering 1-8 all day. Can stabilize the absolute heaviest rounds with out over spinning the lighter ones (200-215)
 

Latest Classifieds

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top