Texas made monolithic bullets ...

So gald I went to bed when I did,,,,
Well sheet looks like another unwatch here later fellas
My sincere apologies; you already know my best intentions. I got this email from Mark this AM.

Apex outdoors e-mail from Mark.jpg


Ed
 
Wow all these new lathe turned copper. brass solid bullets coming out.
I am starting to feel like my copper jacketed lead bullets and my reloading will be obsolete soon if not already!
I don't think they will become obsolete. The only caveat will be if they try to ban lead from hunting bullets. Then all bets are off. That is why we saw some of the major ammunition companies investing in lead free ammo. If we're not careful we'll price ourselves out of being able to hunt.
 
Yup, sorry everybody for my part in the derailment of the thread away from the OP's intentions. The Sun will still rise and set regardless if a bullet has a hole on both ends! 😄 :cool: Lets get back to regularly scheduled fun!
 
I understand gaslighting too, Ed. On another note, when are you going to eliminate your bias and start a thread on the Montana based monolithic bullet company called, Hammer Bullets?
This is the problem with hammer bullets supporters. You guys get sooo defensive. Why come at Ed for educating people on their options? He never bashed your beloved Hammer bullets. I mentioned that I tried them a while back and they weren't my cup of tea - the reason was the BCs. They were nowhere near as good as was advertised. Since this is a long range hunting site, I always chuckle when they are mentioned on here and continue to be blown away at the cult like following. I mailed the remaining hammers I had to a buddy in Cali.

Once again, I think it is awesome that there are so many options out there for us to choose from and people like Ed willing to share that information with us.
 
Last edited:
I don't agree. He made a statement that I dont totally agree with but I did not see it as a fight. I saw it as having some merit based on his background. I got roughly a similar response form feenix even after stating how I saw benefits to the bullet but finding some of it hard to believe. I've got a lot of respect for both you and feenix Here but even by his own standards he should never try anything but Berger and the high bc they carry.
I am a skeptic at heart and admitted that I would take a look at any bullet I think my fit for what I need. But left that thread a little dumbfounded that I shouldn't be able to be a bit skeptical of claims. Same as I was with hammer. It took a long time before I finally tried them.
Again I may be off base here Feenix which probably got started by quoting a post I may be should not have and just commented on my thoughts alone. I've been wrong many times in my life and I will gladly own them if my experience changes my opinion. That's all I am trying. To say in these threads is my initial opinion and thoughts nothing more so I'll leave it at this and move forward with productive conversation. Kinda went off the rails in a way I regret
X-2
 
Yup, sorry everybody for my part in the derailment of the thread away from the OP's intentions. The Sun will still rise and set regardless if a bullet has a hole on both ends! 😄 :cool: Lets get back to regularly scheduled fun!
Oh man…further derailment but the way you word this gets me thinking…I recall in an article that the Barnes bullet was envisioned in a "what if we took the lead out?" epiphany in the field…

The cavity back is the progression of this thought to the partition bullet. The CBB is just a lead free Nosler partition!!!!!!!!🤣
 
Top