• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

which S&W 629? Mostly for range (occasional hunt)

Bigeclipse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
1,972
I am interested in getting a 44mag smith and wesson 629. This will be mainly a range gun, BUT I will bring it on an occasional deer hunt this year. Not sure if I will like handgun hunting yet so id say right now it will be 80% range use and 20% hunting. I have decided on a 629. I was thinking of a ruger super redhawk but just could not get over the looks of it so please do not chime in and say get a super redhawk or regular redhawk. I will not be shooting overly aggressive loads. I am torn between getting a 6 inch half lug, 6.5 inch full lug or 5inch full lug. This may sound dumb but in this case because it is not a dedicated hunting pistol, looks are most important, then comes functionality/balance. So what say you all? Which do you prefer, half lug or full lug, slightly shorter 5 inch or slightly longer 6.5 inch. These are the current models sold so lets keep it with these models for lengths of barrels. I will most likely NOT put a scope/red dot on it BUT I might...will the 5 inch be long enough or would the scope end up getting muzzle blast? Thanks everyone.
Note- The 5inch would probably balance better but I am not able to hold one, I would have to order that model. Also, it appears the five inch would be more desriable for a resale so may hold value better? The 6.5inch would probably give better sight radius for hunting/shooting at farther targets.
P.S. I wanted to start a poll but I am no longer able to see where the poll button is...
 
Last edited:
Key will be what is the minimum barrel length by state law to hunt with. Most have 5 1/2 minimum so check and then decide.


Have you seen the new smith model 69 which is a 5 shot L frame
wouldn't that be a lighter frame and thus recoil would be more...
 
I'm mostly a rifle guy but, I've got an older 629 in 44 mag for bear protection. It has a 6" barrel with full lug. It also has the unfluted cylinder which I think really looks sweet. I would go with the longer barrel for mostly range work, or hunting for that matter.
 
I have the 5" full lug and really like the looks of it. It balances well too. It is just a little long for riding on an ATV on your waist. Any shorter and performance is going to drop off.

My vote is for a 5" + full lug and deal with figuring out how to carry it in woods.
 
I have the 5" full lug and really like the looks of it. It balances well too. It is just a little long for riding on an ATV on your waist. Any shorter and performance is going to drop off.

My vote is for a 5" + full lug and deal with figuring out how to carry it in woods.

When in the woods I tend to hunt from a tree stand with a backpack so i could simply put it in that. I am sure I can find a generic shoulder holster if I decided to do more stalking style hunting.
 
I used to carry a 7 1/2" Ruger Red Hawk in a Uncle Mikes Shoulder holster while hunting and it carried really well. Dirty Harry carried his 6 1/2" Model 29 Smith in a Bianchi shoulder holster pretty well. :D
 
I'm mostly a rifle guy but, I've got an older 629 in 44 mag for bear protection. It has a 6" barrel with full lug. It also has the unfluted cylinder which I think really looks sweet. I would go with the longer barrel for mostly range work, or hunting for that matter.

I have the same style, an early 90s Classic Hunter. Its a great revolver.

When in the woods I tend to hunt from a tree stand with a backpack so i could simply put it in that. I am sure I can find a generic shoulder holster if I decided to do more stalking style hunting.


There are very few options available in stores. I just had one of these made for my scoped 629:
https://shamrockholsters.com/?page_id=100

Take a look.
 
I'd go with the 5" full lug. It's high on my list of firearms to acquire, with exactly the same intended purpose as you. I own revolvers with longer barrels, but I really think 5" is the sweet spot.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top