Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Yeah, I had to just stop reading. Where is the data that supports the claims? If they had wind tunnel vids, or anything but some long winded marketing/sales spiel, I would give them more creedence. Who always shoots compressed loads to the point that hollow cavity would even make a difference? Rubbish. I've been cursed with the barometer of truth.
ya, I was in similar frame of mind, reminds me of the 300 PRC getting "improved" by 2 gr to gain 300 FPS and eternal barrel life, lmao !
X-2
They are right here in Bozeman I will have to check it out.
Yes Sir! I might have to visit them and then to Rex Silentium.
I have a Rex Silentium suppressor and Like it a lot. It is very well made, a bit heavy, but very nice.
The Cavity Back bullets were really focused towards the gas gun crowd. Trying to shoot mono-metal bullets in a gun with very tight OAL restrictions leads to compressed loads in most cases. That's why they also sell the windowed AR magazines; to help with the OAL restrictions in any way possible. The slight benefit given by the hollow base is definitely relevant when the bullets are used under those circumstances. It's probably less significant when used in larger cases or platforms without the OAL limitations found in gas guns. I've used these bullets in gas guns chambered for the 6.5 Grendel, 6.5 BRX, and 270 AR with good results on target. The increase in usable case capacity becomes pretty significant when dealing with relatively small cases to begin with.
It's not negativity. It's the uncanny ability I have to see the truth in matters. Probably because I spent many years in the fact finding, investigate, and business intelligence industry. Could also blame it on my critical thinking abilities and experience in marketing and propaganda. I'm not gonna be fed a spoonful of crap and smile with crap in my teeth.
Wow…tons of over the top stories, BS, and leg humping. Seems eerily familiar!
Please enlighten me on your insinuation.
