Because it changes the barrel harmonics and might affect bullet POI, esp. at long range.Many people on here use muzzle brakes and many others hate them.
Why not take the break off for hunting & put a thread protector on???
I do it on many of mine......
Exactly!You mean Brakes
If you hate it, why bother?
If you like them, why take them off for hunting?
An effective muzzle brake serves two purposes, a reduction in felt recoil and a reduction of muzzle rise. The latter is often not realized. I am not recoil-sensitive (but I know others that are), but I have been using muzzle brakes since 2003. Most of my hunting rifles now sport a muzzle device (MBs and suppressors).Yeah, you don't want to be changing how you shoot during parts of the year. If you suck so bad or are weak to the point you NEED a muzzle brake, then you're probably going to keep it.
If you have the ability to manage recoil like an adult, or you (more likely) shoot an overbore (probably some 6.5) cartridge, then it's really a non-issue all together.
Being aware of what a muzzle brake does, I addressed both those two things.Because it changes the barrel harmonics and might affect bullet POI, esp. at long range.
Exactly!
An effective muzzle brake serves two purposes, a reduction in felt recoil and a reduction of muzzle rise. The latter is often not realized. I am not recoil-sensitive (but I know others that are), but I have been using muzzle brakes since 2003. Most of my hunting rifles now sport a muzzle device (MBs and suppressors).
Well said!!!!!!!!!It is GREAT TO HAVE CHOICES! We don't all have to shoot the same cartridge, or same setup, or same anything.
I shoot 375H&H with out a Brake and with. I shoot 22-250 without and with a Brake. MY choice! Nothing anyone says can "insult my manhood"
ENJOY
Exactly! Simultaneously, it allows a 58 lbs 8-year-old girl to shoot dad's .300WM.It is GREAT TO HAVE CHOICES! We don't all have to shoot the same cartridge, or same setup, or same anything.
I shoot 375H&H with out a Brake and with. I shoot 22-250 without and with a Brake. MY choice! Nothing anyone says can "insult my manhood"
ENJOY
I too, am VERY bad@$$.Being aware of what a muzzle brake does, I addressed both those two things.
I have been and am still saying for years now on here, that it's not necessary. At least for .338 and below.
Again, if you manage recoil correctly, you can have good results, and can follow your shot through the scope. The problem is when people rely on the brake for masking bad technique, and recoil management. I don't care about how sensitive people are.
I think you made that loud and clear.Being aware of what a muzzle brake does, I addressed both those two things.
I have been and am still saying for years now on here, that it's not necessary. At least for .338 and below.
Again, if you manage recoil correctly, you can have good results, and can follow your shot through the scope. The problem is when people rely on the brake for masking bad technique, and recoil management. I don't care about how sensitive people are.
It's about learning the craft and not relying on equipment whenever possible. I'm sorry but recoil management is a shooting fundamental in precision shooting. Doesn't matter if you don't like that.I too, am VERY bad@$$.
I never understood why artillery guns have muzzle brakes. They just need to be tougher, less sensitive and have better technique. We are just much smarter than everyone else, it's their own fault, really.
Agreed, man, you and I get it. It's everybody else who are the problem.It's about learning the craft and not relying on equipment whenever possible. I'm sorry but recoil management is a shooting fundamental in precision shooting. Doesn't matter if you don't like that.
Were you in an artillery battalion?
A 155 and a :308/270/.300 whatever, is not the same thing. I thought I was clear that it was appropriate at a certain point, imo, to add a muzzle brake.