Marble
Well-Known Member
I choose leupold scopes because they have never let me down in the field when it comes to performance. Their company stands behind their product and the price I pay is worth what im getting.
I like them.
I like them.
Here's a link to a more realistic price: Leupold Mark 8 3.5-25x56mm Rifle Scope FREE S&H 115062, 115062-KIT1, 115150, 115150-KIT1. Leupold Rifle Scopes.
I don't care what you shoot, just don't try to convince me that a Vortex scope is equal to a Leupold.........
Oh, it's actually only $4,300. What a relief. I'll order one today.
Setting the Mark 8 aside for a minute, let's focus on scopes the average shooter could actually afford to buy. ...
... Here's my opinion about Leupold vs Vortex. For a hunting scope, I would recommend paying the extra 25% premium for a Leupold.
Care to elaborate? What models were they? I'm running two VariX-III's on a pair of Winchester M70s. 7mm mag wears a 3.5-10x 40mm while my 300RUM sports a 4.5-14x 40mm AO. I put the one on the 7mm back in 2000, and it hasn't moved since. I think I clicked the elevation up one step a few years ago. I find the eye relief very forgiving on the rifle, and everyone who has shot it has fallen in love with the setup. Now the other scope, I haven't had to adjust the scope since I sighted it in in 2002. My one complaint against it, the eye relief is more intolerant vs the other scope, and at times drives me nuts. It has held up to a lot of ammo being shot thru this sporter weight, unbraked RUM.
The evidence is on the target. My Leupold puts the holes as close to the center of the target as the Nightforce on the rifle next to mine on the firing line; for a lot less money. The defense rests.
The defense might rest, but on the above statement, the defense would lose. Nightforce isn't the only scope out there besides Leupold. I'll put my Sightron Siii up against your Leupold any day of the week.
You could do that and probably not resolve anything. However, if you went in to the competition with an open mind comparison with let's say a Mark 4 6.5-20 LR/T [$1300 http://swfa.com/Leupold-65-20x50-Mark-4-LRT-30mm-Riflescope-P51668.aspx] and a SIII LRMOA 6-24x50 [$915 http://swfa.com/Sightron-6-24x50-SIII-30mm-Riflescope-P48419.aspx] at failing light. Not knowing which was which, basing your choice on optical performance in low light, you would choose the Leupold 10 out of 10 times.
And reasonably comparable Leupold offerings versus Zeiss Conquest and Sightron SII Big Sky or the Sightron SIIIs? The glass in any of these scopes smoked the Leupold VX 3s to my eyes, when I owned all of them and compared them side by side in the evening, continuously until failing light (darkness). That was about 5-6 years ago. Perhaps Leupold has a Hubble version of the VX-3 today.
And Leupold has named this Model "The Hubble", I presume?
Paul, When doing side-by-side tests in low light, I've found that it is not easy to insure that both scopes are set to the same exit pupil size and magnification. You would have to share the details of your side-by-side comparison for me to understand why the Leupold lost.
I also have read praise regarding the light transmission of IOR scopes but it has always been a 2.5-10x IOR or one of the other IOR 4X power magnification scopes. I've read a lot of forum posts including Snipers Hide, Snipers Paradise, 24 hourcampfire, and many articles, and don't recall a single post or article where anyone has done side by side light transmission comparisons with an IOR 6X power magnification scope. If you're aware of any, I would appreciate your posting the web address so I can take a look. A buddy and I went out one winter evening and compared the following four (4) scopes for light transmission, one being my IOR 3-18x 42mm. We both came to the same consensus, from brightest field of view to dimmest field of view. We did turn all scopes to the same power setting for this comparison.
1st - Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x44mm - Brightest, no doubt about it.
2nd - Leupold LPS 2.5-10x45mm
3rd - Leupold VX3 2.5-8x32mm - Similar to IOR.
4th - IOR 3-18x42mm - Dimmest (Similar to the Leupold VX3).
If the 6X IORs are about the 5th best in light transmission then my comparison couldn't prove it. But they may rank highly against other equivalent scopes that also magnify over a 6X power range. My suspicion is that to achieve the 6X power range multiplication that additional lenses may be required. Each additional lens would cause additional loss of light to the eye.
With respect to resolution, we both rated these four scopes as follows:
1st - IOR 3-18x42mm - Notably the best
2nd - Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x44mm - Pretty good - similar to Leupold LPS
3rd - Leupold LPS 2.5-10x45mm
4th - Leupold VX3 2.5-8x36mm
David, I was afraid someone would ask.
Here's an evaluation I recently conducted and reported for a LRH forum member .
___________________________
"Today I compared the SIII 6-24x50mm to a new IOR 3-18x42mm MP-8 and my Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x44mm Mil-Dot scopes. I conducted an elevation turret test on all three scopes at 100 yds. Then I compared all three scopes for resolution and light transmission at 300 yds in the evening (fading) light. The SIII is hitting on all cylinders and I would rate it the best scope of the three - without regard to cost - provided you're content with that 6-24 power range. Based on cost it's obviously the best buy. Here's how I rated these three scopes. I own all three so there's no pride-of-ownership compromises involved in my evaluation.
Resolution.
1) IOR and SIII equally good at 18X. Then I turned the SIII up to 24X and it maintained excellent resolution and improved my ability to resolve details at 300 yds that I was unable to see at 18X through either the IOR or the SIII. In other words, I felt like I obtained the full benefit of the higher powers available in the SIII. Razor sharp.
2) Zeiss provided less resolution with all three scopes tuned to 14X at 300 yds. Still good, but not as sharp as the IOR and SIII.
Light transmission.
1) SIII - best
2) Zeiss - about midway between the SIII and the IOR.
3) IOR – I believe the IOR has some extra lenses in it to provide the 6X power range magnification, and every additional lens will reduce light transmission.
Weight.
1) Zeiss - 17.5 oz - 1" tube
2) SIII - 21.9 oz - 30mm tube
3) IOR - 28 oz - 35mm tube
Parallax Adjustment.
1) SIII - easiest to adjust, however the adjustment operates at a pretty fast rate.
2) IOR - just about as good as the SIII - operates at a slower rate than the SIII.
3) Zeiss - I've never really cared for the parallax adjustment on my Zeiss. It's OK but sometimes a struggle to know if it's set properly.
Crosshair/Reticle.
1) IOR - Best, I really like the IOR MP-8 reticle.
2) SIII and Zeiss - both standard military Mil-Dot.
Cost.
1) SIII ~$800
2) Zeiss~$850 w/o or $950 with target turrets
3) IOR ~$1565 w/illuminated reticle
Elevation Turret Test Results.
SIII: 0.273"/click/100yds in both the UP direction & DOWN direction over a distance of 26" at 100 yards. Same value/click/100yds in both the UP and DOWN directions, however different than the advertised 0.25"/click/100yds. This is why an elevation turret test is mandatory prior to putting any scope into action. Now that I know the IPHY click value, I'll be all set.
Zeiss: 0.243"/click/100yds in the UP direction over a distance of 26" and 36" at 100 yards. No DOWN test completed with Zeiss.
IOR: 0.260"/click/100yds in the DOWN direction over a distance of 26" at 100 yards.
0.250"/click/100yds in the UP direction over a distance of 26" at 100 yards.
The IOR yielded a different value per click per 100 yards in the UP direction versus the DOWN direction. My other IOR is dead nuts on - yielding 0.249"/click/100yds in both directions. This was a brand new IOR scope so I will have to conduct the elevation turret test again and make sure I didn't make a mistake with my calculations and determination.
[IN ORDER TO CLARIFY MY ELEVATION TURRET TESTS: All three scope's elevation turrets returned to zero properly. From a set Zero, I turned the turret in the UP direction and then returned back to zero. Then I turned the elevation turret in the DOWN direction followed by a return to zero. The IOR yielded a slightly different click value when turned in the DOWN direction than in the UP direction, however it and both of the other two scopes returned back to their zero setting correctly.]
I haven't shot the SIII yet but others have already confirmed the turrets are repeatable and that the scope is durable. The SIII has as good, or better, of a replacement warranty as the Zeiss or the IOR. If I were to buy another scope today, it would be another SIII 6-24x50mm Mil-Dot. Sightron is supposed to be adding some additional offerings to their SIII line. Whether there will be additional reticle options or power options, we'll have to wait and see. I understood they're expected to be out in the late summer-fall.
Hope this helps you spend your money wisely. For the money, the SIII is a best buy in my book." lightbulb
___________________________
The Vortex Viper is another scope that's at least as good as a Leupold VX-3 at a lesser cost, and the Vortex also includes a no fault lifetime warranty. You can run over the Vortex Viper with your GM (or Toyota) and return it for a replacement - no questions asked.
One year earlier I compared my Zeiss Conquest to my Leupold VX-3. The Zeiss Conquest smoked the Leupy in resolution and light transmission. It wasn't really even close. And I'm now telling you that the Sightron SIII bested the Zeiss Conquest in both categories in my recent side-by-side field comparison. The Sightron SIII is Sightron's top of the line scope. Comparing it to the SIs or SIIs is like comparing a Leupold Mark 4 to a Leupold VXII. The current limitations in the SIII series (my opinion) are the power range and the reticle options currently available. I'm led to believe some additional SIII options may become available later this year.
Leupold has made a good solid aiming device for many many years, which is why they still enjoy such a strong following. But there are currently a number of new players competing for their customers, and some are producing a better product with an equal warranty, at a lesser cost. Now I'm going to put my camo face paint back on and try to blend into the background noise...
I provided this head to head comparison of my Zeiss Conquest and Sightron SIII in a Post within another Thread more than 1 year ago. So prices may not reflect current prices.
[I'm referring to the March 3, 2009 Post - the one just prior to this quoted Post.]
I have since purchased another Sightron SIII. I have not conducted another head to head test with my 2nd SIII against the Zeiss Conquest. To be honest, I will say that my 2nd SIII is not quite as good optically as my original SIII. Still good but not quite as good. So I don't know if my 1st SIII was the creme of the crop, or if the 2nd SIII was sub-par. My 2nd one still performs very well in all respects, but the resolution and clarity of the glass is somewhat less than my original SIII.
Sorry. I know this throws the whole idea of SIII quality up in the air with question marks??? But I believe this is somewhat true of many makes and models of scopes. I've read this quite often with the Nightforce scopes over the past three years. Subtle differences in sight pictures between different scopes of the same model. Some have great glass. Some have good glass. I'll probably buy a 3rd SIII unless the feedback on the about-to-be-released Vortex Viper PST line of scopes is overwhelmingly outstanding and too hard to resist.
Perhaps you should approach things with a little more of an open mind...........you might be amazed at what you learn. Did you even know that the Leupold Mk8 even existed prior to my post? (Be honest now as I doubt you did)
Here's another one for you: Leupold Optics Mark 4 ER/T 6.5-20x50mm (34mm) M5A2 Locking Adj. - | Leupold Optics
I have two of these, they are ffp, MIL/MIL with a locking elevation dial, capped windage 34mm tube and another awesome scope..........it's closest competitor I'd the NF ATAC( I have a buddy with one, he's a NF guy), but it's only second focal plane.
Another thing I love is how all you guys can look through a scope side by side in a store, outside or wherever......hold up your big fat thumb and proclaim that one is clearly better than other, really?
Have you ever seen a Leupold fail, I have.......their biggest issue is loosing their ability to track, usually on the elevation dial......had it happen to me once in twenty years. I sent it back and got it reconditioned and it works fine now, no questions asked.
Ever seen a Vortex fail?, I have...just two weekends ago we had a new guy out shooting with us and he had a Viper PST on a .308.....half way through the day it looked like some paint chips or something came loose from the inside of his tube....there were big black specs of something all over his field of view and they changed with every shot!! Damnedest thing I've ever seen, I'm sure that Vortex will take care of him.....i hope, if it were a Leupold I'd know for sure!!