Mikecr,
Do you actually weigh the powder at times to compare to that what the Chargemaster throws? How accurate does it work?
When I first bought it(I was an early adopter), I did a lot of testing as measured with a more accurate scale(ACCULAB). The first thing I seen as is commonly seen is random overcharges. This occured as extra kernels of powder fell to cause atleast the number entered.
A weakness in the CM is that RCBS programmed to scale to read the correct charge -even with an overcharge condition. I call it a weakness to be nice.. And then when folks compared perfectly indicated charges on their RCBS, to more accurate scales, they seen apparent poor accuracy from the RCBS scale.
But the problem was not RCBS scale accuracy. The scale is accurate enough and can show single kernels difference. Does you no good, and often worse, to use a scale more accurate than single powder kernels weigh.
The problem was the overcharge condition.
That is, extra kernels falling within the scale settle time. Keep this from happening, and the dispensing will take you right to single kernels.
I did a few mods, straw, programming changes, tray weight. But the best was an analog adjustment to the motor speed. With this I could calibrate the drop rate at final slowest jogging to get single kernel falling(per powder) within the scale's settle/read time.
I tested for months with this, comparing measurements, and concluded that the Acculab could go. I can watch dispensing and tell if it's right or wrong without even looking at the readout or comparison measure. So I dial in the speed where it's always right for the powder I'm using.
It's sad that RCBS didn't modify their design as I had, but at least they brought this product to market. Others are only copying RCBS(without improvement, divvy the market), or poor in design otherwise.
It's a shame there is so little loyalty to original innovators among us. As a loyal group we could have persuaded RCBS to further development of the CM.