G
Guest
Guest
Warren
Simply put, my facts agree with Harold Vaughn, your theoretical nonscientific tripe does not. I will take his 30 years of research, over your 3 days of Doppler fondling any time, any where.
Not to mention the fine scientists and engineers at Sandia National Laboratories that structured tests to prove concepts pioneered by Harold and his crew of professionals. Concepts that proved very successful in the real world of nuclear ordinance delivery systems.
You had your one and only chance to step up to the plate with a scientific justification for your perpetual motion bullet theory. Instead you decided to get personal so before I go there.......
Last time I checked the common boat tail bullet design is aerodynamically unstable and must be gyroscopically stabilized with this little thing we call SPIN that can be measured in radians per second.
Since any remotely sane equation for gyroscopic stability shows that spinrate (think radians per second) is a major influence on GS, and Mach number only a slight influence:
And it takes energy to accelerate (DO WORK) increase spin frequency (MORE radians per second)
WHERE DOES THIS ENERGY COME FROM?
Does the BULLET'S ENERGY REALLY INCREASE AFTER IT LEAVES THE BARREL?
Or would you have us believe that the spin moment of inertia increases independently of spin frequency by some majical force Obi Wan doesn't even know about.
You see Warren there is this little thing called E = MC squared.......
I would not be so arrogant as to give some one I don't know an unsolicited recommendation, however, I do see some plausible options.....
A) Spend less time shooting, fondling RADAR, giving unsolicited recommendations, and more time NEAR your computer FIXING that EMBARASSING SOFTWARE you make available on your website (lostriverballistic.com)
B) Go back to designing crates for hand grenades, and stay away from large radiation sources.
C) Figure out how to make higher density bullets with the CP closer to the CG and NOT VIOLATE ANYONE ELSES PATENTS. Some respectable terminal effect at long range impact velocities would be a nice addition.
D) Keep doing what your doing: insulting people, promoting myths, and TAKING ALL THOSE CREDIT CARDS.
[ 12-24-2002: Message edited by: S1 ]
[ 12-25-2002: Message edited by: S1 ]
Simply put, my facts agree with Harold Vaughn, your theoretical nonscientific tripe does not. I will take his 30 years of research, over your 3 days of Doppler fondling any time, any where.
Not to mention the fine scientists and engineers at Sandia National Laboratories that structured tests to prove concepts pioneered by Harold and his crew of professionals. Concepts that proved very successful in the real world of nuclear ordinance delivery systems.
You had your one and only chance to step up to the plate with a scientific justification for your perpetual motion bullet theory. Instead you decided to get personal so before I go there.......
Last time I checked the common boat tail bullet design is aerodynamically unstable and must be gyroscopically stabilized with this little thing we call SPIN that can be measured in radians per second.
Since any remotely sane equation for gyroscopic stability shows that spinrate (think radians per second) is a major influence on GS, and Mach number only a slight influence:
And it takes energy to accelerate (DO WORK) increase spin frequency (MORE radians per second)
WHERE DOES THIS ENERGY COME FROM?
Does the BULLET'S ENERGY REALLY INCREASE AFTER IT LEAVES THE BARREL?
Or would you have us believe that the spin moment of inertia increases independently of spin frequency by some majical force Obi Wan doesn't even know about.
You see Warren there is this little thing called E = MC squared.......
I would not be so arrogant as to give some one I don't know an unsolicited recommendation, however, I do see some plausible options.....
A) Spend less time shooting, fondling RADAR, giving unsolicited recommendations, and more time NEAR your computer FIXING that EMBARASSING SOFTWARE you make available on your website (lostriverballistic.com)
B) Go back to designing crates for hand grenades, and stay away from large radiation sources.
C) Figure out how to make higher density bullets with the CP closer to the CG and NOT VIOLATE ANYONE ELSES PATENTS. Some respectable terminal effect at long range impact velocities would be a nice addition.
D) Keep doing what your doing: insulting people, promoting myths, and TAKING ALL THOSE CREDIT CARDS.
[ 12-24-2002: Message edited by: S1 ]
[ 12-25-2002: Message edited by: S1 ]