• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Bullet test 5 top premium LR 308 bullets

DartonJager

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
1,010
ad
ad










fivebullets02_0.jpg


In theory, the perfect big-game bullet would fly dead flat, expand to double its unfired diameter on impact, penetrate just through the far side of every critter, and then drop straight to the ground, having spent all its energy on tissue damage. And it would do this as perfectly at 800 yards as at 80.


Of all the challenges this presents to bullet makers, the key one, given our current long-range craze, is the last. As a general rule, a bullet's ability to expand and damage tissue decreases as it slows. It's one thing to mitigate this problem out to 300 or 400 yards, as some manufacturers have through better bullet construction. It's quite another when those distances double.
With 21st-century riflemen shooting to previously unthinkable ranges, the bullet maker's challenge in the new millennium is to design projectiles that shoot as flat as possible, that are minimally affected by wind, and that deliver deadly performance from the muzzle out as far as you can make a good hit.
In the Lab
In reality, the perfect bullet not only doesn't exist—it can't. The laws of physics prevent it. But that hasn't kept makers from chasing the ideal. So in an effort to find the modern big-game bullet that gets the closest to perfection, I used Hornady's ballistic laboratory to test five .30-caliber hunting projectiles at .300 Win. Mag. velocities. There, Doppler radar measured flight consistency (from shot to shot) and bullet velocity from the muzzle to 800 yards. I also fired each bullet into ballistic gelatin at 150 and 800 yards to gauge expansion and penetration. The listed scores are out of a possible 100, based on a comparison with our theoretically perfect bullet.


1. Hornady ELD-X, 212-grain

Total Score: 84


I've seen the ELD-X in action on big game to 700 yards. It is impressive. The bullet has a radically tapered jacket, an internal lock, and a new tip designed to increase flight consistency. It is only loaded in Hornady Precision Hunter ammunition.
• Velocity Lost at 800 Yards: 973 fps • Flight Consistency: 99.999% • 150-Yard Expansion: 0.515 inch (1.67 times original diameter) • 150-Yard Penetration: 24 inches • 800-Yard Expansion: 0.580 inch (1.88 times original diameter) • 800-Yard Penetration: 27 inches
Comments: Hornady let me use its lab based on its confidence in how this bullet would perform—and that trust wasn't misplaced. The company had no influence on my testing or the results. The ELD-X's top-ranking flight consistency, and near identical performance at 150 and 800 yards, earned it the top spot.

2. Nosler AccuBond LR, 190-grain

Total Score: 77
The AccuBond has proved to be a stone-cold killer inside 500 yards. The LR is engineered to fly flatter, and it is bonded to help keep it together. It's available in loaded ammunition from Nosler.
• Velocity Lost at 800 Yards: 1011 fps • Flight Consistency: 99.986% • 150-Yard Expansion: 0.480 inch (1.56 times original diameter) • 150-Yard Penetration: 18 inches • 800-Yard Expansion: 0.480 inch (1.56 times original diameter) • 800-Yard Penetration: 28 inches
Comments: Expansion at 150 and 800 yards was amazingly identical, if moderate, and the AccuBond LR retained velocity reasonably well. It had the least consistent flight of any bullet tested, but the difference from best to worst was slight. And it produced the deepest straight-line penetration at 800 yards.

3. Barnes LRX, 200-grain

Total Score: 68
I've used LRX bullets at common hunting distances with great success in North America and Africa. This is an all-copper boattail bullet, with a plastic tip to initiate expansion and flatten trajectory. Barnes offers them in its VOR-TX line of ammunition.
• Velocity Lost at 800 Yards: 1121 fps • Flight Consistency: 99.990% • 150-Yard Expansion: 0.610 inch (1.98 times original diameter) • 150-Yard Penetration: 30 inches • 800-Yard Expansion: None (1.00 times original diameter) • 800-Yard Penetration: 34 inches
Comments: The LRX could not have performed better at 150 yards. Impacting the 800-yard target at 1666 fps, however, it exhibited no expansion and tumbled through the gel block. Solid copper bullets typically need to impact at 2000 fps or faster to show significant expansion.

4. Berger VLD Hunting, 190-grain

Total Score: 60
During a hunt in New Zealand, my party took almost 50 big-game animals using VLDs. We had no complaints, and some shots were beyond 500 yards. All Berger bullets are known for accuracy. The Hunting Shack offers VLDs in some loaded ammunition; otherwise they are for handloaders.
• Velocity Lost at 800 Yards: 1003 fps • Flight Consistency: 99.995% • 150-Yard Expansion: 0.535 inch (1.74 times original diameter) • 150-Yard Penetration: 18 inches • 800-Yard Expansion: None (1.00 times original diameter) • 800-Yard Penetration: 24 inches
Comments: In the short-range test, penetration was a bit shallow, but the VLD expanded wide and created a wicked wound cavity. Flight consistency was very high. However, the VLD failed to expand at 800 yards and tumbled through the gel.


5. Hornady SST, 180-grain

Total Score: 60

I've seen great things from SST bullets on various big-game animals inside 400 yards. Prior to 2016, this was Hornady's long-range hunting bullet. It is a conventional design with a plastic tip. Hornady offers a wide selection of ammo loaded with SSTs, and in Remington ammunition this bullet is known as the AccuTip.
• Velocity Lost at 800 Yards: 1267 fps • Flight Consistency: 99.989% • 150-Yard Expansion: 0.655 inch (2.13 times original diameter) • 150-Yard Penetration: 17 inches • 800-Yard Expansion: None (1.00 times original diameter) • 800-Yard Penetration: 24 inches
Comments: Expansion at 150 yards was impressive, which limited penetration somewhat. At 800 yards the SST tumbled after impact, which caused the plastic tip to shear and the nose to smear in a way that looked like expansion but wasn't.

RELATED:









Tags:





 
5. Hornady SST, 180-grain

Total Score: 60

I've seen great things from SST bullets on various big-game animals inside 400 yards. Prior to 2016, this was Hornady's long-range hunting bullet. It is a conventional design with a plastic tip. Hornady offers a wide selection of ammo loaded with SSTs, and in Remington ammunition this bullet is known as the AccuTip.
• Velocity Lost at 800 Yards: 1267 fps • Flight Consistency: 99.989% • 150-Yard Expansion: 0.655 inch (2.13 times original diameter) • 150-Yard Penetration: 17 inches • 800-Yard Expansion: None (1.00 times original diameter) • 800-Yard Penetration: 24 inches
Comments: Expansion at 150 yards was impressive, which limited penetration somewhat. At 800 yards the SST tumbled after impact, which caused the plastic tip to shear and the nose to smear in a way that looked like expansion but wasn't.

The 800yd bullet picture conflicts with the associated description of expansion @ 800yds. Sure looks like the nose of the bullet was pushed back and expanded, to my eye. A measurement of the diameter of the shank where the jacket has folded back will exceed 0.308". Yet the description is 1.00 times original diameter.

Dunno what else to say about it... It looks like expansion because it is expansion, IMO.
 
I wish they would have used a 210 Berger , or better yet a 215. Looks like heavy for caliber offerings excelled. With the exception of the solids.

Jeff
 
I wish they would have used a 210 Berger , or better yet a 215. Looks like heavy for caliber offerings excelled. With the exception of the solids.

Jeff

I would also like to see muzzle velocities to go with the velocity lost at 800.
 
The 800yd bullet picture conflicts with the associated description of expansion @ 800yds. Sure looks like the nose of the bullet was pushed back and expanded, to my eye. A measurement of the diameter of the shank where the jacket has folded back will exceed 0.308". Yet the description is 1.00 times original diameter.

Dunno what else to say about it... It looks like expansion because it is expansion, IMO.
Definitely. Somewhere around 1.3-1.4x diameter would be my estimation.
 
Why use the 190 Hunting VLD and ABLR when there are 210gr versions of both? Makes me wonder how the results really would have turned out...
 
I wish they would have used a 210 Berger , or better yet a 215. Looks like heavy for caliber offerings excelled. With the exception of the solids.

Jeff

I was just fixing to post that... They really sandbagged the Bergers (appears to have been on-purpose) by using a 190 instead of the 210 or 215...

I mean, how can you, in good conscience, compare a 212 ELD-X to a 180 SST Hornady and a 190 Berger VLD... You can't, unless you're pushing your own bias.
 
Maybe because not everyone uses the heaviest for caliber offering available in every bullet every time?

True, not trying to argue.. Just curious as they used one of the heaviest ELDs vs more mid weight offerings in the other brands. Not really a straightforward comparison. Why wouldn't they run theirs against similar equals from their competition? Kinda like putting a Top Fuel Dragster heads up vs a Pro Stock.
 
Maybe because not everyone uses the heaviest for caliber offering available in every bullet every time?

This is true, but would the comparison not be closer to apples to apples if the test weights were closer? Especially when the companies tested have closer offerings? If we took a poll of Berger 30 cal hunters, and the weights used , would the 190 even be worth counting?

Just some thoughts.

Jeff
 
IMO, looks like the 800 yard Berger had the Berger closed tip syndrome. Just yesterday I was working with some 140 VLDs from two different lots. One lot had an unbelievable number of closed tips I had to open up. The other lot hardly had any....
 
This is true, but would the comparison not be closer to apples to apples if the test weights were closer? Especially when the companies tested have closer offerings? If we took a poll of Berger 30 cal hunters, and the weights used , would the 190 even be worth counting?

Just some thoughts.

Jeff

Yep. The only reason I use 185 VLD's is because my .30-06 AI is a 1:12" twist. If it was a 1:10, I would use the 210/215's.

I have a box of 168 VLD's that I bought back in 2013 for testing in my .308 Win, and they shot 1-hole groups. But then the next week I started testing with 210's (just for experimental fun) and got the same size 1-hole groups, but it was thumping so much harder, despite the slower MV, that I've been using them ever since.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top