meatyrem
Well-Known Member
Yes I have checked ou their website. They show perfect expansion every time, of coarse why wouldn't they. That is what I wanted to hear, from all of you, who have the experience. It seems as if I'm hearing half of good and half of bad. Even tho barnes advertises perfect performance, I for one know that every shot fired at game is NOT balistic gelatin filled game. Every shot will not be the same as the last. Way too many variables. Their tests are way too simplistic, your gonna get the same performance every time when you fire a bullet into the same material every single time. They should try more REAL world tests. Balistic gelatin does not have skin ( light or heavy ) or bone in it or muscle, tendons or ligaments and conective tissue or the many other things I am not mentioning.
Now, I've always thought that the nose cavity on the tsx was too small let alone inconsistant from one to another.
Would any of you fellas out there say that barnes improved it with the ttsx? With a larger more defined hollow point?
By the way, I am loving the feedback, excellent from everyone! I'm not trying to get a ****ing Match going here, just like to weigh everything out. I take a long time thinking and evaluating before I go ahead with something. Just because I know every situation is not shooting balistic gelatin.
Meatyrem
Now, I've always thought that the nose cavity on the tsx was too small let alone inconsistant from one to another.
Would any of you fellas out there say that barnes improved it with the ttsx? With a larger more defined hollow point?
By the way, I am loving the feedback, excellent from everyone! I'm not trying to get a ****ing Match going here, just like to weigh everything out. I take a long time thinking and evaluating before I go ahead with something. Just because I know every situation is not shooting balistic gelatin.
Meatyrem