• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

.277cal Hornady A-MAX

Jud96

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2013
Messages
3,648
Location
Michigan
I would really like to see Hornady bring out an A-MAX for the .277 diameter in a couple of different bullet weights. These would be great in everything from the traditional .270 WIN to the new wildcat .270s. Every caliber from .224 to .338 has an A-MAX available besides the .270 daimeter, and I would like to see that change. Just want to see if anybody else would be interested in seeing A-MAXs for the .270cal, thanks.
 
I like them in my .223rem, I can only dream about them in my .270win. I'd love to see Hornady come to the plate with a new offering. Maybe the 6.8 black rifle popularity will build a fire under their rear-end.
 
I like them in my .223rem, I can only dream about them in my .270win. I'd love to see Hornady come to the plate with a new offering. Maybe the 6.8 black rifle popularity will build a fire under their rear-end.

+1 everyone loves these bullets! I can't wait to try the 208gr A-MAXs in my .308 Norma and look forward to try the 105 grainers in my .243 Winchester. If they would just bring out an A-MAX in the 140ish weight for the .270 I'd be pumped! A heavier A-MAX in the 155-168gr range would be sweet for those big .270cal magnums. The BCs are great on these bullets and I would estimate a .277cal 140gr A-MAX would be around .525 G1 BC and the 160ish A-MAX to be .650 or better. I currently use a 140 SST in my .270 WIN but would switch to that 140gr A-MAX in a heart beat! I would also consider building a wildcat .270 Magnum to shoot the heavy A-MAXs in.
 
Is anyone one else besides ShowMeShooter and me interested in seeing a .270cal A-MAX?
 
I'd be interested, but Matrix Ballistics has some 165's and 175's that would be hard to compete with.

I understand what you're saying. I believe though if Hornady introduced these they'd take over. A-MAXs are already really affordable and have an amazing reputation. The A-MAXs are also manufactured on a larger scale and more widely available through stores and not just from the manufacturer like Matrix bullets are.
 
I understand what you're saying. I believe though if Hornady introduced these they'd take over. A-MAXs are already really affordable and have an amazing reputation. The A-MAXs are also manufactured on a larger scale and more widely available through stores and not just from the manufacturer like Matrix bullets are.

I am not trying to be smart, but please show us where to get Amax's right now? Hornady has slowed or stopped production of most of them for the time being. I just ordered and received 200 of the 175's from Matrix in less than 2 weeks, from Canada. The Amax should be cheaper though, for sure.

I don't mean to get of topic, I too think an Amax in the .277 caliber would be a great addition to the market. As more and more high BC bullets are developed for it, I think we will just see more and more 270's used.
 
I am not trying to be smart, but please show us where to get Amax's right now? Hornady has slowed or stopped production of most of them for the time being. I just ordered and received 200 of the 175's from Matrix in less than 2 weeks, from Canada. The Amax should be cheaper though, for sure.

I don't mean to get of topic, I too think an Amax in the .277 caliber would be a great addition to the market. As more and more high BC bullets are developed for it, I think we will just see more and more 270's used.

I'm just saying my local sporting goods stores have A-MAXs in every caliber and almost every weight that's available for most given calibers.
 
We got .338 A-Max.

Some of us want .375 and or .277 A-Max.

I hope Hornady responds.
 
We got .338 A-Max.

Some of us want .375 and or .277 A-Max.

I hope Hornady responds.

I sent Hornady a product request for these bullets nearly two weeks ago and have yet to hear from them. I believe these would be a hit for the new .270 wildcats and old tried and true cartridge ls.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top