[ QUOTE ]
Dang it. I hate it when I can't find the post I'm looking for. Somewhere, somebody asked if I would take a pic of the round next to a .308 to show size. Well, I don't have a .308 round to show, but here are some other familiar rounds next to the fat pig.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yep. That was me. I went looking for that same post so I could quote it here for you.
Whatever. I looked and couldn't find it either. Oh well.
Dang cool photo. I love shots of loaded rounds all shiny and sleek.
[ QUOTE ]
I found the .338 L imp to look and exhibit similiar properties to the 6.5-.284. They look almost identical proportionately. Similiar neck length, similair body fatness in relation to caliber, same shoulder angle, same length body in relation to the rest of the case, and so on.
[/ QUOTE ]
Same thing with the .223 and the .300 win mag. I noticed this several years ago when trying to explain what I knew about case efficiency and inherent accuracy to my brother.
You want to do something fun? set the camera on the table and place the smaller rounds (.223 and 6.5) close to the lens (still able to focus easily) then set the larger rounds farther back on the table so they appear to have the same height brass as the smaller of each pair and post a photo of this to help illustrate your point.