6.5 CM, 6.5 PRC Enough/Effective for Elk?

RugerHawg413

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
165
Location
Arkansas
Hello,
I have two rifles that I am deciding on which one of them to make my main go to rifle, one is a 6.5 CM and the other is a 6.5 PRC. The only concern that I have about them is, is that are either 6.5 CM or 6.5 PRC effective on elk? I have heard a lot of people go back and forth regarding 6.5 CM for elk. But, I am having a harder time finding info regarding 6.5 PRC on elk. I prefer the 6.5 CM rifle to the 6.5 PRC. So, I guess my real question is 6.5 Creedmoor effective on elk??

I have found a 7mm rem mag that I like, but would rather not spend the cash on something while I already have something that works just fine.

Any and all info and wisdom are appreciated! Thank you!
 
Hello,
I have two rifles that I am deciding on which one of them to make my main go to rifle, one is a 6.5 CM and the other is a 6.5 PRC. The only concern that I have about them is, is that are either 6.5 CM or 6.5 PRC effective on elk? I have heard a lot of people go back and forth regarding 6.5 CM for elk. But, I am having a harder time finding info regarding 6.5 PRC on elk. I prefer the 6.5 CM rifle to the 6.5 PRC. So, I guess my real question is 6.5 Creedmoor effective on elk??

I have found a 7mm rem mag that I like, but would rather not spend the cash on something while I already have something that works just fine.

Any and all info and wisdom are appreciated! Thank you!
No wisdom to impart but I am interested to hear some responses. I have 2 Creedmores and really like them. I bought a PRC for a little more "oomph" if I ever do go for big game. Realistically, I really don't think I'd shoot at anything out over 500 yards anyway, based on my ability, so maybe that's not "Long range" hunting but everything is relative. On YouTube (the informational authority for everything) a fella shot an Elk at over 630 yards with a Creedmore and put it down. Under reasonable conditions, I'm sure it can be done. Please don't tell anyone I like the Creedmore.
 
Yes it's fine but keep in mind you need to be careful of bullet choice. This year my 6.5 creed killed a cow at 430 yards, then a 325 bull and a cow both at 608 yards. Last year same load different gun took a large bull over 600 and two cow. I didn't have as good of luck with the 143-147 eld. I switched to the hammer 123gr and it's been very accurate and deadly.
 
Both will certainly work! However, I hunted with a 6.5SST a few years ago. Took the new toy instead of choosing one of several more suitable options. I got my elk with some luck and a good angle but, I sure felt undergunned the whole trip. Won't do that again!
If a 6.5 will do, a 7 will do it better so let's just take a 338 to be sure… is my philosophy going forward.
Good luck with your hunt!
 
Gday rugerhawg413
Snox & syncerus1 are onto it 👍
yep projectile choices 👍 & no doubt you'll see when things go right & that's cool but I'd suggest you look @ the ones that go wrong & try & find out why they went wrong as nothing worse than being on the end of the oh no problem

A good general rule of thumb is over penertration is better than under


caveat make sure the pill still has a good wound channel

I like bigger calibers on bigger critters overall but warming to the 6.5 as you get the better pills & it's pretty cool what they can do
Here's a few critters that are pretty hard to put down but the better 6.5 projectiles do get it done with the 😇😍not 😢🤬

5D092EC1-2EFD-40C3-B327-FB14F8826725.jpeg
B48A02E2-A0F0-4FC2-BEC4-01E9FF00D951.jpeg
EEFCAB21-8B86-448B-9FD5-EB05C1319E2A.jpeg
0657BB6D-1664-435E-BCF2-4EBF009B596A.jpeg

Cheers
 
Gday rugerhawg413
Snox & syncerus1 are onto it 👍
yep projectile choices 👍 & no doubt you'll see when things go right & that's cool but I'd suggest you look @ the ones that go wrong & try & find out why they went wrong as nothing worse than being on the end of the oh no problem

A good general rule of thumb is over penertration is better than under


caveat make sure the pill still has a good wound channel

I like bigger calibers on bigger critters overall but warming to the 6.5 as you get the better pills & it's pretty cool what they can do
Here's a few critters that are pretty hard to put down but the better 6.5 projectiles do get it done with the 😇😍not 😢🤬

View attachment 541401View attachment 541402View attachment 541403View attachment 541404
Cheers
Understood! Thank you for the info!
 
I like bigger calibers on bigger critters overall but warming to the 6.5 as you get the better pills & it's pretty cool what they can do
Here's a few critters that are pretty hard to put down but the better 6.5 projectiles do get it done with the 😇😍not 😢🤬
I have always preferred bigger, but the newer bullets have made smaller choices legitimate.

The 270 has killed a lot of elk historically, but also came with controversy. meaning not everyone was having the same level of satisfaction. These failures were generally bullet related, and again newer bullets make it better.
 
@fordy do you have weights for those critters? Leave it to @fordy to walk in an drop some reality.

Today moreso than ever in the history of hunting has there been a case to run what you bring. Bullet construction and reasonable placement trump diameter, just look at the Rokslide 223 77gr TMK thread.

Now if you want to discuss shooter ability combined with smaller calibers, that is a valid discussion. To simply cast aside a chamber simply because of diameter is foolish.

A 338 is just as capable of failure in the wrong hands as a 223 is capable of success in the right hands. Margin of error only comes in to play based on the skill set of the hunter.
 
Top