Remage Opinions

upload_2018-8-17_10-25-44.png


BW
 
what are you afraid of, I'm not understanding how it could be a gamble?

What if it doesn't shoot? Not saying I wouldn't try but there's a reason a smith wouldn't recommend it. What kinda money would it take a guy to buy everything to diy?
 
What if it doesn't shoot? Not saying I wouldn't try but there's a reason a smith wouldn't recommend it. What kinda money would it take a guy to buy everything to diy?

If it didn't work the first time, you would pull it back apart and have the action blue printed .. when you had the funds and then reassemble.

I suspect many of us believe that 85 to 90 per cent of the accuracy is due to the barrel and it's chambering along with the addition of a good trigger.

A smith is conflicted by having to do the job right or perfect as his name will be tied to it. Then there is the appearance issue. Barrel nuts are not the most pleasing looking assembly...and what smith wants to turn out something he might think is ugly. But obviously there is nothing wrong with setting head space with a barrel nut as Savage does it and has some very accurate rifles.
 
If it didn't work the first time, you would pull it back apart and have the action blue printed .. when you had the funds and then reassemble.

I suspect many of us believe that 85 to 90 per cent of the accuracy is due to the barrel and it's chambering along with the addition of a good trigger.

A smith is conflicted by having to do the job right or perfect as his name will be tied to it. Then there is the appearance issue. Barrel nuts are not the most pleasing looking assembly...and what smith wants to turn out something he might think is ugly. But obviously there is nothing wrong with setting head space with a barrel nut as Savage does it and has some very accurate rifles.

Plus smiths lose money but not doing the extra step of blue printing...they have to make a living. My smith just thinks they are hideous.
 
If it didn't work the first time, you would pull it back apart and have the action blue printed .. when you had the funds and then reassemble.

I suspect many of us believe that 85 to 90 per cent of the accuracy is due to the barrel and it's chambering along with the addition of a good trigger.

A smith is conflicted by having to do the job right or perfect as his name will be tied to it. Then there is the appearance issue. Barrel nuts are not the most pleasing looking assembly...and what smith wants to turn out something he might think is ugly. But obviously there is nothing wrong with setting head space with a barrel nut as Savage does it and has some very accurate rifles.

If the factory barrel not is not pleasing, below are a couple of alternatives ...

http://www.bugholes.com/category-s/1984.htm

https://bighornarms.com/product/12-point-barrel-nut/

or go without ...

HF73NP2.jpg
 
What if it doesn't shoot? Not saying I wouldn't try but there's a reason a smith wouldn't recommend it. What kinda money would it take a guy to buy everything to diy?
Smith won't recommend cause it takes him out of the equation. Need go gage and no go and action wrench. Maybe a barrel vice to get the old barrel off. Cheaper than the smith will charge to mount your barrel. And after that one time the tools are paid for. Barrel swaps are free after that. Other than barrel cost
 
Smith won't recommend cause it takes him out of the equation. Need go gage and no go and action wrench. Maybe a barrel vice to get the old barrel off. Cheaper than the smith will charge to mount your barrel. And after that one time the tools are paid for. Barrel swaps are free after that. Other than barrel cost


I agree with this 100%. I don't have a remage but a buddy of mine has one in 6x47 and its sub 1/2 moa @ 500+ yds... easy, cheap, and faster... it's a win win
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top