the differences between all the units is nil at best. But I gotta ask you one question; I see that you have the screens setup at 34 feet from the muzzle. Any particular reason why?
gary
Hi Gary,
As I was typing that information, I was wondering if it wouldn't prompt the question. No scientific reason was involved. The only reason I placed the skyscreen rail that far from my muzzle was due to the ground surface terrain/elevation where I set up to shoot. The local range where I normally shoot out to 300 yards has been closed to access for quite some time now. So I had to improvise and locate a suitable 'range' on a power line clearing with a downrange hillside for a safe bullet backstop. It was simply that the topographic relief where I set up required that the tripod and skyscreen rail be that far in front of the muzzle in order to get the correct bullet-above-skyscreen separation distance.
I normally set the first skyscreen up about 15 feet off the muzzle - or as far as the cables will reach from the three chronograph computer units. And I haven't experienced any muzzle blast-related problems with the skyscreens placed 15 feet ahead of the muzzle. This time I had to get up from the prone position after each shot and walk out to retrieve and record all the data from the three chrono units. Not really a problem since there I was out in the boonies all by my lonesome - no other shooters around. Some brown bear tracks up and down the power line though! Another good reason to get up and look around after every shot fired!!!
I agree that the differences between the three units on this outing is for all intents and purposes - negligible. I don't plan on tweaking any of the skyscreen separation distances. Now that I know that the one channel reads a couple fps faster than the other three, as long as I experience that on all the shots fired, I'll know the data is completely proper - based on the existing skyscreen separation distances.
Cheers,
Paul