Bino Recommendation

 
I agree with a lot of others I'd give the Leica Trinovids a look and the Zeiss Conquest as well. When I was shopping for my $1k pair of binoculars SLCs were still on the market. I went with the SLCs even though they busted my budget and I'm not upset that I did. If I would've stayed in my budget the Leicas would've been my choice. You'll have to go look through some to tell what YOU like the best. I spent a few months going around and looking through as many as I could find. Pay attention to how comfortable the eyecups are and the depth of focus - that's one thing I noticed is amazing with the Swarovskis, I don't have to constantly adjust the focus wheel when changing the distance I'm glassing.
 
regardless if you want them or not...I'd personally never buy binos that don't serve dual purpose as an LRF
For me the LRF binos were like alpha glass, once you know, you know. My 10x42 Zeiss Conquest are great, but after hunting with a set of binos that range it is hard not to carry them. But at his price point, you won't get a LRF pair that will have the glass of the Zeiss and as others correctly mentioned, in the early/late hours or the total hours behind the glass will play a part when it comes to quality. Depends on how you hunt and what your wants/needs are, budget is definitely up there.
 
I didn't know what to expect when I posed the question, but this topic seems similar to asking ten chefs how to cook [fill in the blank]. Ten different answers will follow. There is a great deal of consistency in these answers, which definitely helps. Thank you!

Please keep the recommendations coming.



 
First let me say that I've never owned Sworovski binoculars. I have however, compared Swaro SLC's side by side with Vortex HD and UHD binoculars. Full disclosure, it was during the middle of the day. Under those conditions, did I notice any kind of difference? Yes, I did. That difference was at the extreme edge of the field of view. It was subtle, extremely subtle but my eyes did detect it. Would that difference be more pronounced early in the morning/late in the day/during really flat light conditions - I'd bet yes, it would be. How pronounced would it be - I have no clue. For me and my intended use, was that real/likely difference worth the cost differential (nearly 3x) - no it was not. If money was no object, I'd run Swaro 10x42's without question. I personally am not in that situation. I don't know yours beyond what you stated, but I will say that there is a reason why most folks hold up Swaro binoculars as the standard to which every other binocular is compared. That said, I've been very happy with the Vortex UHD's that I have had for the past several years and wouldn't hesitate to recommend them to anyone.
 
Get that pair of slc posted above.

Besides good boots nothing will waste your time like crappy binos. I would give up most of my gear and hunt with a savage before giving up my swarovski EL 10X42s.

They save me hours during the day. I can look at sign 30 yards in one direction and see if it is worth checking out. I can look at a hillside 400 yards away and see tracks. All without wasting a step.

Go to a store and compare. Sit there looking at stuff in the store for 5 minutes at least and you'll quickly realize which binos you'll use all day every day.

I started learning 10x more about sign, terrain, and see way more animals because i actually use my binos.

Trying to thread the value needle on binos is about the worst thing i can think of. Find a good deal on swaro EL 10x42s and enjoy them the rest of your life.
 
Since I'm new here... I wanted to give the forums a spin and get some input based on real-life experience, not some paid promotional pushers on the web. I'm looking for binos for a backpacking muley hunt later this year. I've been looking at the Tract Toric 10x42s and Leupold BX5 Santiam 10x42s. Thoughts? Can I go wrong with either? Are there others I should be considering? My preferential budget is under $1K.

Thank you!
So here is a different kind of answer. Compare as many as you can and do it looking outside at things if you can do so in clear air and natural sunlight. Looking across a big box store is pretty useless. My answer, like many leans toward a Swarovski. I have a 30 year old pair of 10X42s, and a pair of nearly as old 8X30s because I wanted something just as good, but smaller and lighter for tighter timber hunting. Both are as good as when I bought them.

The 10X42s came about because I pulled a bighorn sheep tag and all I had then was some pocket Zeiss 10X. Speaking to spending many hours behind binocs, at the time I was working full time as a field biologist and spent probably 6 hours a day using a pair of 10X40 Zeiss. There were things about those Zeiss I found not the best, that being sun flare, and the fact that tracking flying birds at the edges of the field of view gave a feeling of vertigo. Apparently the coatings were not the best, and certainly the ground area at the edges was lacking. (I had the Zeiss to use because we had had a sorry pair of Nikons that were intolerable for many hours of use at a time, and I insisted that we had to have good glass. Nikon binocs then were several classes below their camera lenses!) I had seen/used some Swarovskis a writer friend had been reviewing, and had been impressed. Upshot was I ordered both from Cabela's, and compared the Zeiss against the Swarovski, using both on tripods. Dawn to dusk, close into the sun at sunrise and sunset, close focus, distant objects, etc. The Swarovskis proved best on the edge grind, and superior on coatings against sun flare. I still use them pretty much daily.

Swarovski also has superior warranty service and customer service. During that sheep hunt, I scratched the coverglass on one objective lens while belly-crawling in talus. Swarovski replaced it for free. Years later they were offering a special on older binoculars, and free of charge they completely refurbished the 10X for me, returning them like new, but for sure with the original lenses. Amazing service. They also adjusted the focus on the 8X free of charge. I only paid shipping to them; they covered the return shipping costs.

So although this reads like a sales brochure for Swarovski, my advice is to compare the best you can afford, and then buy the best you can find of those. Prorate that cost over a lifetime of use. Right now, my 10X42 Swarovskis have cost me about $36.00 per year, and the annual cost gets cheaper every year.
 
We have Swaro El 10x42s, and they are great. Having said that, I had a Leitz Wetzlar West Germany 7x35 rebuilt that is wonderful. But those have dried up. So, Swarovski, Zeiss, Tract, or Meopta. I suggest you look at the birding groups, as they use binos year round, and are much more versed in optics than most of us.
 
We have Swaro El 10x42s, and they are great. Having said that, I had a Leitz Wetzlar West Germany 7x35 rebuilt that is wonderful. But those have dried up. So, Swarovski, Zeiss, Tract, or Meopta. I suggest you look at the birding groups, as they use binos year round, and are much more versed in optics than most of us.
Good advice, that. My frugal Mom, about 28 or so years ago, wanted new birding binoculars. We took her to Cabela's to try out as many as they had. She bought Swarovskis, and now at 100 years old is still using them for birding. (She only needed the 8X10s, but there is a birder example.)
 
Good advice, that. My frugal Mom, about 28 or so years ago, wanted new birding binoculars. We took her to Cabela's to try out as many as they had. She bought Swarovskis, and now at 100 years old is still using them for birding. (She only needed the 8X10s, but there is a birder example.)
Wow, 100!!!!!
 
Top