Which way to mount?

Ernie

SPONSOR
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
3,066
Location
Wyoming
I am going to be using a Harris Bi-Pod BRM version for the International Tactical Rifleman's Championship (all shooting from prone position with field rest, steel targets, out to 1,000 yards) with a Remington Center-grip H-S Stocked XP-100 in 6.5-284.
In your opinion is the best way to mount it the traditional way or backwards?
Just getting done with load development from the bench and have not done much group shooting with a bi-pod before. Thanks for your thoughts.
 

4ked Horn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,521
XP, Why would you mount them backwards? Have you seen this before?
 

Ernie

SPONSOR
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
3,066
Location
Wyoming
4ked horn,
I read somewhere (can't remember where) that it actaully aided/benefited accuracy. I have not tried it for myself yet, and was wondering if anyone else had tried it.
 

4ked Horn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,521
If the bipod was not very tall, 13" model or less, I could see how it might help reduce the felt recoil a small bit but that energy would inturn tweak upward on the forend and also damage the legs of the bipod. I'm not sure I like the trade off on that option.

I would take a look at the source of the idea as it might be in the "hold your pistol sideways" category of info. There is a certain situation where you would tilt the pistol to the side for more appropriate aiming but it is a limited purpose. In the same manner the backwards bipod may serve a good but limited need that might not be practical for our LRH purposes.

If you could track down the source of that idea I would like to know. We never know when we might learn something new.
 

Brent

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2001
Messages
2,537
Location
Palmer, Alaska
My brother mounts his backwards on his 338/378 WBY, as it's more compact. No ill effects on accuracy and the bipod is plenty tough... no way it's breaking or getting worn out from it.

I've planned on one mounted on the rear sling swivel stud on my Ultra to see how that works with another up front. Anyone ever tried it?
*
 

4ked Horn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,521
That looks interesting. I'm interested to know how it will affect your elevation adjustments. I also wonder how it will be trying too get back on target for any quick follow up shots.

[ 07-05-2004: Message edited by: 4ked Horn ]
 

Trending threads

Recent Posts

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top