LRNut
Well-Known Member
Why is anyone in this day and age using a phone ballistic app instead of a RF with an app like AB? I was shooting my .308 Win yesterday at 500 yards and I admit that I use Ballistic AE on my iPhone- but only because I already have too many profiles in my SIG 10K. I shoot that .308 at 500 yards or less and so I don't have to constantly change environmental conditions (my 500 yard hold is 3.0 mils on a hot day and 3.1 on a cold day) - I use Ballistic AE for a wind solution - but having shot that gun at the same range for 20 years, I really don't even need that.
Since I bought my first SIG RF with AB, I have relegated phone apps pretty much to the dust bin. Switching altitudes (my CO place is at 8750), going from cold to hot, wind and aerodynamic jump, etc. is just too much to input in a phone app. I upgraded my Kestrel to the elite version, but honestly, it is just an expensive anemometer at this point.
So my big question: is anyone using a phone app preferentially over an integrated RF such as SIG 10K, Revic, Leica, etc? If so, why? What is the advantage? I understand some users might not have an integrated RF for cost reasons; I am curious if anyone with a recent model RF with integrated ballistics such as AB is still using a phone solution.
Since I bought my first SIG RF with AB, I have relegated phone apps pretty much to the dust bin. Switching altitudes (my CO place is at 8750), going from cold to hot, wind and aerodynamic jump, etc. is just too much to input in a phone app. I upgraded my Kestrel to the elite version, but honestly, it is just an expensive anemometer at this point.
So my big question: is anyone using a phone app preferentially over an integrated RF such as SIG 10K, Revic, Leica, etc? If so, why? What is the advantage? I understand some users might not have an integrated RF for cost reasons; I am curious if anyone with a recent model RF with integrated ballistics such as AB is still using a phone solution.