LUCKY.....GROUP......CLUB ( BI - PODS - ..ONLY )

Boyd

It seems intimidating at first, but It looks solvable, lets look at what there is to work with.

I just missed a crow last month at almost the exact same distance, on a cold bore shot in 23 degree conditions so I am really confident in my elevation number since we were about 800 ft. above sea level. think of it as a "delayed" spotter. with my 600 yard zero, that puts me about 14.75 moa up at 1,050 yds, the temp is slightly warmer, and the buck is 10 yards further so they cancel, and unless I find evidence of thermals I will read the wind and go with about 1 to 10 ratio vertical to horizontal with my wind correction.

Reading the wind here is not hard, the low temps and snow will cut down on available mirage, but look at the tree cover and ground cover, this is what will make the shot possible. The debris and small branches will be a great indicator of wind speed, and a bird flying through that valley will tell you what kind of thermal rises are present. Looking for birds on branches, they tend to stick their faces into the wind.
In hills like that, there are thermals that run in and out, up and down, this is what will bite you if you don't find them. In the afternoon the air tends to run down hill, and in the morning it runs up hill, faster if the sun is shining on the hillside. Weight what you see on the nearest hill to your location, watch the fur of small animals, and the feathers of small birds. Leaves that occassionally fall from the tops of trees.

I would be concerned if there is much overhang on the rock, this presents a problem if the buck is too far under the rock. If he is just below, its no problem.

Lets say there is a 15 mph wind from 3:30 to 9:30 my full value 10 mph wind correction would be about 7 moa times 1.5 for the higher wind speed gives me 10.5 moa times .95 because of wind direction minus .5 for yaw gives me about 9.5 Moa for wind correction and about 4 clicks down to take care of the right to left vertical component.

Dead buck.
smile.gif


[ 01-12-2003: Message edited by: S1 ]
 
Went to the range today to try some new loads. Rifle was M70 300winmag, Leupold 6-18/40 target, off a harris bipod, shot nearly free recoil. Loads were all Rem cases and CCI 250 magnum primers. Bullets were 178gr Hornady A-max(thanks S1), RL22 powder, oal. 3.555
When I left there was very little wind. At the range wind was 5-8mph from 4:30-6:00 o'clock. All groups were shot at 100yds. Three targets left to right and another three below.
75gr shot at first target.
75.5gr shot at second target.
76gr shot at third.
Then 75gr at first target on bottem, 75.5 at next, etc., etc.. Untill I had shot six three shot groups. This, I believe gives a more representitve group size, as all rounds have the same amount of fouling. Anyways the average group size was .71moa. With the sweet spot at 76gr, average was .48moa, largest, .555moa. Smallest measured .421moa.
smile.gif
In the last few days I have been trying different methods of holding the rifle while using a bipod. For this particular rifle, dug in were the rifle is extremly low, slight pressure on butpad, with sandbag all the way to the rear, as far as it will go, light contact with my ring and pinky finger, and cheek just resting naturaly on comb. So far this producedes CONSISTANT sub-moa performance out to 440yds, even on firm surfaces.
smile.gif
 
I was taught that if you feel a light breeze on your face that the wind was about 4 mph. Leaves on a tree that move constancely are being moved by a 5-8 mph wind. But if you see branches swaying then the wind is blowing about 15 mph.

So I try to look for things around the object that I want to shoot to help figure out wind conditions.

Hopes this helps someone with reading the wind. My great grand father told me that when I learning to hunt squirrels.
 
All right, here we go <fastens his bronze breastplate, while checking to make sure sword is loose in the scabbard>

S1's attention to detail is right on; but, to make a theroetical answer, we're going to have to assume a few things, or state them at the very least. Given the conditions you set forth, this is what I come up with given my load criteria <which I'll list.>

I would've missed on my first shot--forgetting that the angular drop would not work with my *standard* 100 yard zero [in fact, Dave King just brought this very topic up today! <chuckles>] My sight height I actually figured for 2", which, as best I can measure, appears to be accurate. Actual load is a .338 300gr. SMK at 3195fps. I estimated a downward angle of 17 degrees, and an anglewind direction offset of 35 degrees. I'm probably muffing it up horribly all ready, but if he starts to run, maybe he'll fall for the accoustics trap of echo and be spooked towards me after the shot.
smile.gif


OK, if I did everything correctly, given the new conditions I come up with about 3.9 MOA for windage, and....about 19.8 MOA for drop. I changed the BC values, also. For the best I can tell, the 300 gr MK has about a...797 BC. I gave it three values, in decending order: .797, .780, .767. I don't know exactly how accurate these figures are; as I said, I've only been able to test the weapon out to 700 yards, and so far these figures have come very close to field data. The area I may have muffed the biggest would be angular drop--17 degrees might not be right on! <chuckles> In Minnesota, I did a lot of shooting across lakes <talk about a thermal problem!!!--updrafts to drive a person to insanity. I wish I could find better places, because for a new shooter, it introduces too damned many variables to make analysis completely efficient.> The difference I came up with for a theoretical drop at 100 yards level fire with zero range set to 5 yards <stupid program would compensate any lower, but that's with .15", anyhow" and drop if there were a 17 degree angle upon sight-in was .993% of full value, so I would think my drop chart checks out; the MOA difference is slight. Does this seem reasonable to you? Thanks for posting a good challenge; We'll call it virtual training! Keeps me sane while I'm suffering from withdrawl sickness.

Dave

Assumptions: the deer is NOT wearing body armor, the birds are actually facing INTO the wind <unlike last years frigging duck decoys of mine>, and the thermal up drafts are starting to equalize <ambient light condistions seem consistant, it appears to be mid-afternoon, I would say humidity LOOKS slightly <20%?> greater than 50%, but I've never been out your way, so I would have no clue. I would say, aside from the wind, conditions should be as stable as they're likely to get. Of course, that's easy to say; I'm sitting in a chair in my reckroom. Upon being there, I might instantly insist you take the shot!! I would want to watch for as long as I could in that type of conditions. In all honesty, I try not to shoot in wind stronger than 10mph; I'm still a greenhorn!
 
Boyd

What changed?

Someone came along that you do not know, and can not bully....., someone that does not care about 80 lbs. rifles for hunting animals. Someone who is interested in DC's techniques, but also likes to discuss other techniques for hunting. Notice the original subject of this thread.

I have noticed you and bh, and joesaki constantly jump in, attack, take cheap shots, change the subject, and proactively antagonize people that do not agree with you. I do not think you have ever made an accurate rifle, or bullet, or have much technical expertise. It is obvious to many my comments make your little world so insecure, I'm sorry. Some things learned in the tactical world are useful to long range hunting, and you don't have to be a sniper to use them. I think if I copied your last E-mail to me, over to this forum, the average guy reading it would feel insulted by your comments. Contrary to what you believe, the average guy can learn to read the wind better, and it will make them a better hunter.

Whats different is now there is someone who hunts with a bipod, and leaves the heavy suits at home. Someone who in a discussion of hunting with heavy rifles, makes a suggestion to try a quality drag bag, because they actually work. Someone who brings expertise you don't have, and you can't attack or bullsh_t your way around.

Someone who reads the wind and enjoys talking about the techniques involved, someone who stays on the subject if allowed.

Notice the subject matter of this thread, if you have some groups you have shot off a bipod why don't you show them, instead of your _ss.
smile.gif
 
Cybra

WOE DOGGIE on the inclination angle, with out Len's trick Lieca, we can get pretty close, with just careful observation.

One degree is about 5 feet at 100 yards, about 56 ft. at 1,060 yards; look at the treeline on the horizon, and down to where the target is, I would guess no more than 400 feet below the horizon level with our position. 400 feet of elevation change divided by 56 feet, gives us a tick more than 7 degrees of inclination. Hilly country can be awful tricky when it comes to estimating inclination angle. Most guys really overestimate, if they do not have a good tool. Just remember 1 degree gives you about 52 ft. at 1,000 yds.
wink.gif


[ 01-13-2003: Message edited by: S1 ]
 
Boyd

Missed the wind conditions you stated the first time I read your post, got too many bumps on the head over the years. Is the wind in your face from the center of the picture, and the target on the right edge?
 
Based on the fact that a 15mph wind at 12:30 would produce 28" of drift, I wouldn't take the shot. If it was switching from 12-1 o'clock your talking a 50" swing in wind deflection alone! A 15 mph wind at 3 o'clock might be doable but not for me at 12.

What can you do to determine wind direction shifts of only 1/2 to 1hr? Wind vane setting on a clock?
grin.gif


A couple sighter shots here would help confirm the wind, that's for sure.
wink.gif
 
Cybra

You most certainly need to smell more burning gun powder if you have been without for almost two years.
grin.gif


Another good trick is to hunt/shoot with your wife or girl friend.
wink.gif


Brent
In the situation and location Boyd is at, the "Spotter system" works great. I only mention this as you said you would hold the shot. In your swamp, thick forrest area of Alaska, the spotter system may not work to well unless there is an opening and you have a good spotter with you with bigeyes.
In the picture of Boyds spot in PA,
I would send a spotter shot "or two" over there at the 1250 yd side hill (100 yds to the left of the buck), make my final adjustments off the impact of the bullet and from what my spotter told me (unless I saw the impact myself) the adjustments would take no more then 5 seconds at the most, then swing on that BIG buck and kill it in his bed.
This system has worked for my friends and I for many years now and in the type mountain area you see in the pic. If I were to use the one shot method at the 1250 yd range, I too would hold the shot till better conditions were seen.
Hence, dead buck with the spotter system and maybe an emty freezer with the one shot method because of the held shot and conditions that never improved?

This is why most of us use the spotter system in PA and out west when we go after elk and mule deer. It is a VERY productive way of killing your game.
The range has a lot to do with it also with the average LR hunter. Under 1000 yds, the one shot method is not too hard, after that, it is a bit more involved. The two methods most certainly depends on the range you are firing and the "training or experiance" you have had in each.

Later and good shooting.
DC

[ 01-13-2003: Message edited by: Darryl Cassel ]
 
S1,The wind is blowing in a stright line from where the deer is.12oclock...Just to add something...There is ALWAY'S.. a very bad updraft over the 700 yard hill
 
Max, being poorly versed in the skill and science required for this shot would naturally dial in 42.7 on the PRC-25, call 'Big Crown, Big Crown, Snake27, Fire Mission over.' Dead buck, processed but not packaged.
frown.gif
This is the zenith of the spotter system, and he lets Red Leg worry about the updraft. Never forget the other options
grin.gif



Sorry for the interruption guys, carry on.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 22 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top