• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Load development

mkk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
407
Location
Gulf Coast Texas
I am quite sure this will create some debate because I know there are several different ways to accomplish a load for my rifle.

I am limited to .030 off the lands because of a magazine

1. Should I start with .030 OTL and play with powder in .5g increments? If so when I find that nice group then try to tweek the OTL



2. Should I start with a set charge of powder and play with seating depth? When I find the sweet spot then start adding powder assuming I will start at a low charge initially
 
Last edited:
Either approach will work but there are quite a few bullets that like to jump 0.030" give or take with Berger VLDs being a possible exception so I'd load up a ladder with your chosen powder and see what it will do with the 0.030" jump.
 
I say do a full blown seating test, if results are beyond the magazine go to another bullet or eliminate the magazine limit.
Shoot a ladder, test a couple possibles from the ladder, and tweak seating to shape grouping.
 
I'd find a rough preferred seating depth, then work up a powder charge (Optimal Charge Weight) and then fine tune seating depth.
 
I would start with a minimum charge and play with seating depth to see if the rifle will shoot well at .030" or if it'll handle something maybe even a bit shorter. Never know 'til you try! Once you figure out what depth your rifle has a tendency to shoot well, start playing with powder charges to find a velocity node that produces the accuracy you are looking for.
 
all good advice on seating depth....
I will say that the size of the case plays into how large of a jump I'll go between charge weights... a 223 or similar may well need a small charge increase like .5 gr... A bigger caliber like a 300rum may not really show changes until you jump a couple of grains at a time... You can always fine tune your charge...
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top