I\'m not finding any data
In regards the recent thread about "inherent accuracy", rather than bring that back to the fore, I will say only that I have not uncovered any meaningful data to support the contention. I shall keep my eyes open in any event, but all I know is posted on the other thread. I remain skeptical of the theory, and have nothing in hand or enroute to dispell that. I have reviewed a number of noted and respected treatments of internal ballistics, note the regard some cartridges bask in, and am left to conclude that taking care of fundamental issues of design and assembly is the key, not reliance on say-so.
BTW, new NBRSA 1000 yd. record of 1.4" give or take, for 5 shots was fired not too long ago. Just read about it in Varmint Hunter Mag yesterday. Sooooo, how's that 1/2 MOA looking now? I think .25 is a better benchmark, JMO.
Regards to all, faithful or blasphemers.
In regards the recent thread about "inherent accuracy", rather than bring that back to the fore, I will say only that I have not uncovered any meaningful data to support the contention. I shall keep my eyes open in any event, but all I know is posted on the other thread. I remain skeptical of the theory, and have nothing in hand or enroute to dispell that. I have reviewed a number of noted and respected treatments of internal ballistics, note the regard some cartridges bask in, and am left to conclude that taking care of fundamental issues of design and assembly is the key, not reliance on say-so.
BTW, new NBRSA 1000 yd. record of 1.4" give or take, for 5 shots was fired not too long ago. Just read about it in Varmint Hunter Mag yesterday. Sooooo, how's that 1/2 MOA looking now? I think .25 is a better benchmark, JMO.
Regards to all, faithful or blasphemers.