Gel Test Data part 2

I figured I would start a new thread to finish the first one, since it got a bit sidetracked. I got the video segments of the gel testing and the long range shooting session that I promised to add. For those that may not have seen the original thread, I copied the original post from the 1st thread.

Last week we had a film crew out to do a video on load development. While they were here, we also did a video of a gel test with the Hammer Hunter 199g 30cal compared to a 215g highly reputable long range hunting bullet. For the test we used two different rifles. For the short-range test we used a Browning Hells Canyon Long Range in 300 Remington Ultramag with a 1-8" barrel twist. This rifle was brand new out of the box, had never been fired prior to working up the loads for the test. For long-range testing we used a 30-06 semi-custom rifle with a 1-9" twist on a Tikka action.

The first goal for the testing was to simulate a high velocity impact, for each bullet, using top end loads in a factory 300 Ultramag off the shelf rifle, that would be common to hunters wanting to hunt to long range. The second goal was to simulate a long-range impact, that would be below 2000 fps for each bullet.

We started out by loading the 30-06 with each bullet. We were aiming to get about 2200 fps for the 215g bullet and about 2300 fps for the 199g Hammer Hunter. This would put them as close as possible to the same impact velocity at 300y, based on the bc for each bullet. We used Peterson brass for each rifle. For the 215g bullet we loaded with Varget at 39g for a vel of 2210 fps. Es was pretty wide but accuracy was solid sub moa, close to .5" at 100y. For the 199g Hammer Hunter we also loaded Varget at 40g for an average vel of 2320 fps. Also a pretty wide es but still running solid sub moa at 100y. I was actually surprised that both bullets shot ragged holes with such a mild load. At these velocities the stability factor for each bullet calculated at sea level was 1.65 sg for the 215g bullet and 1.48 sg for the 199g Hammer Hunter. A little lower stability for the Hammer Hunter, which could be a bit of a handicap. We now have the loads done for the long range test.

Next, we worked up loads for each bullet with the 300 RUM. Idea here was to get as much out of each bullet as we could. For both bullets we used ADG brass and Fed 215m primers. For the 215g bullet we used rl33 at a top end of 103g with a vel of 3170 fps. I was hoping for 3200 fps, so we got pretty close. For the 199g Hammer Hunter we used n570 at a top end of 102g with a vel of 3440 fps. Both loads were top end and should not be loaded without starting 10% lower and working up. These loads were not pushing the ADG brass too hard. Primer pockets were still tight. Now we are ready to go smack some gel.

Gel testing was done with Clear Ballistics 10% gel blocks. We used their 18"x8"x8" blocks. For each test we put two blocks end to end with a box of newspaper behind that, in case we had a bullet fully penetrate both blocks. We first fired the 215g bullet, after checking to make sure the hollow point was open and not plugged with lead. Got a good hit and the bullet performed as I think it is supposed to. Entered the block and initiated expansion at 2" with a very large wound and the retained portion stopped just before exiting the first block. Total penetration of almost 18". The permanent wound made it to about 11" with a very small wound to the stopping of the bullet. All in all, I thought this was pretty good. Which is really what we want when comparing our bullet to another. We want to compare to bullets that have a reputation for great performance. Impact velocity for the 215g bullet at 100y was 3044 fps, calculated from advertised bc and the atmosphere at the shooting location.

gel test 100y 215g.jpg

The blob at the end of the block is from me cutting out the retained portion. Should have taken the pic before I cut it out.

Next we fired the 199g Hammer Hunter. The pure copper Hammer Hunter initiated expansion at 2" and created a very large wound with the bullet exiting the top of second block at 33" of penetration. The bullet exited the top of the block as the blocks were launching into the air from the impact. Should have held them down, but it doesn't look as cool for the video. Luckily it was caught in a catalog in the box of paper. Stuck in the catalog with the base of the bullet just exposed. At 100y the impact vel of the Hammer Hunter was at 3285 fps. Wound channel from the Hammer Hunter was very large to about 13" and then moderately large to 27" and the retained shank made a small permanent wound to 33". This is the kind of performance we expect at very high vel impacts.

gel test 100y 199g Hammer Hunter.jpg

Now for the 300y low velocity impact testing. We started with the 215g bullet. We adjusted the scope for the expected drop and fired on a paper target to confirm POI. In the dot, so here we go. Took the next shot at the gel, after checking to make sure the hollow point was open and hit center of the block. Muzzle vel reading from the Labradar was 2157 fps putting the impact vel at 1856 fps. Right in the velocity range we wanted to test. On inspection of the gel blocks we found that the 215g bullet entered without any permanent wounding until the bullet penetrated 9.5". At this point there starts to be a permanent wound and then you can see where the tip of the bullet folded over and broke off at about 10". The separated tip traveled to 14". It appears that just after the tip broke off the jacket and the core separated. The core went down and stopped just inside the second block at 19" and the jacket went on to stop at 29". You can see that there is another wound coming in form the left. That was from the next test as we turned the block around. Both projectiles happen to stop at the same point in the block and you can see the scar from me digging it out.

gel test 300y 215g impact.jpg

Time now to confirm the drop at 300y with the 199g Hammer Hunter. Took the shot and hit a bit high so came down and hit a bit low. Needed to come up a click and I think I clicked down. Oops. Tuned out ok as I hit bottom half of the block but everything stayed in the block nicely. Muzzle vel for this shot was 2233 fps putting the impact vel at 1870 fps. Perfect! Within 14 fps of each other. Don't think we could have got them any closer to the same impact velocity. The Hammer Hunter initiated expansion at 2.5" into the block and created a fairly large permanent wound channel for 15" and the retained shank came to rest at 24" of penetration. This again is exactly what we expected to see.

gel test 300y 199g Hammer Hunter.jpg

Here is some pics of the recovered bullets at each range along with an unfired bullet for reference.

gel test 100y recovered.jpg gel test 300y recovered.jpg

After the gel test we went to the mountains to shoot the two bullets across the canyon at 867y out of the 300 rum. Shot the 215g bullet first. Hit an moa high and 3 moa to the right. Dialed the corrections and put it on the rock. Next fired the 199g Hammer Hunter. Took a couple of moa off and held the same wind. Wasn't too concerned with elevation with these shots, but more concerned with how much wind hold would be needed. The 3moa of wind hold was perfect for both bullets. We will see how the video turns out on the long-range shooting. Hopefully you can see the bullet impacts well. The video should be done in the next couple of weeks. We ran two cameras for the gel test. One behind the shooter and one at the gel. Should turn out pretty cool. I will post it as soon as it is done.

Here is the video of the gel testing. It turned out pretty good, I think.



Here is the long range shooting session comparing the 199g Hammer Hunter with the 215g competitor bullet. You will see that we started with the 215g bullet dialed for elevation and no wind hold. After making a windage adjustment on the dial, we confirmed on the .5 moa target. We then took off 2 moa of elevation for the 199g Hammer Hunter and shot with the exact same wind dial. Result was same poi for both bullets, indicating that there is no advantage to the higher bc of the 215g competitors bullet at long range.


Did I miss what velocity the 215 was running at vs the 199? Mv wasn't mentioned unless I missed it as well as the range. If the Hammer is running faster than the 215 and tge range isn't far enough for the bc of the 215 to take over then they'll have similar wind holds.
 
Did I miss what velocity the 215 was running at vs the 199? Mv wasn't mentioned unless I missed it as well as the range. If the Hammer is running faster than the 215 and tge range isn't far enough for the bc of the 215 to take over then they'll have similar wind holds.
Also, what was the speed of the wind? Comparing the 199 hammer to the 215 berger, with the 199 @3100 and the 215 @2950, if your shooting at say 800 yards, in a 10 mph wind, the difference in the two is only .5 MOA using the listed bc's of the two. It's going to be difficult to see 4.2" difference of impact in dirt, at nearly a half a mile. Drop the wind to a 5 mph, and now the calculated difference is only 2". Your not going to consistently see that difference, at 800 yards, in the dirt

I'm not saying it's not there, I'm just saying, if you want to show everyone something of evidentiary value, do that same test, but shoot it on paper, where you can actually measure the difference. That would be much more definitive and really help to establish your point. There have been many times I shot groups on rocks at 600+ yards, spotting my shots, and was sure I had a .25 MOA group because they all looked like they hit the same spot, only to go look at it and find my group was closer to .75 MOA. Dirt splash can be hard to interpret, holes in paper though, they are rock solid. The preliminary testing is still good though, thanks for taking the time to do so.
 
Last edited:
Also, what was the speed of the wind? Comparing the 199 hammer to the 215 berger, with the 199 @3100 and the 215 @2950, if your shooting at say 800 yards, in a 10 mph wind, the difference in the two is only .5 MOA using the listed bc's of the two. It's going to be difficult to see 4.2" difference of impact in dirt, at nearly a half a mile. Drop the wind to a 5 mph, and now the calculated difference is only 2". Your not going to consistently see that difference, at 800 yards, in the dirt

I'm not saying it's not there, I'm just saying, if you want to show everyone something of evidentiary value, do that same test, but shoot it on paper, where you can actually measure the difference. That would be much more definitive and really help to establish your point. There have been many times I shot groups on rocks at 600+ yards, spotting my shots, and was sure I had a .25 MOA group because they all looked like they hit the same spot, only to go look at it and find my group was closer to .75 MOA. Dirt splash can be hard to interpret, holes in paper though, they are rock solid. The preliminary testing is still good though, thanks for taking the time to do so.
I know all this takes time when testing and comparing , my bet is Steve will do exactly what you are suggesting in the near future, especially being so much emphasis is put on BC . It seems with some shooters even hunters BC takes President over Terminal Performance . Personally in my mind BC is something that can be calculated and verified at different hunting distances Terminal Performance is most important too me .
 
The numbers are all in the first post. Without looking back I think the 199g Hammer Hunter was at 3460 fps and the 215g competitor was at 3170 fps.

I wish I had a spot that I can hang a target at long range. Working on a new place. Hoping.

The question then becomes, how far do you have to shoot for the higher bc bullet to have an advantage? I've been told for years now that Hammers are not good for long range due to less bc. I do not believe that bc is an exact predictor of wind drift.

As far as how far the wind was blowing. There is no way to know. There was a slight breeze at the shooting position. The first shot with the 215g competitor bullet showed a needed correction of 3 moa. Dialed the correction and put the next two shots on the spot. Then took the 199g Hammer Hunter and pulled 2 moa off the elevation and shot with the same wind correction impacting the same spot. I'm pretty sure that there would not be any advantage in wind drift until there is a significant difference in time of flight between the two bullets. Even then I am not sure there would be a significant diff.

When we did these tests, we did not know what the results would be ahead of time. We did not run these tests before. We learned the results in real time. This was literally the first time I had ever fired one of this competitors bullets. The goal with the tests was to compare to another bullet that is considered one of the best.
 
I know all this takes time when testing and comparing , my bet is Steve will do exactly what you are suggesting in the near future, especially being so much emphasis is put on BC . It seems with some shooters even hunters BC takes President over Terminal Performance . Personally in my mind BC is something that can be calculated and verified at different hunting distances Terminal Performance is most important too me .
Under the current understanding of BC being the determination of wind drift, to a point you are correct, and for the majority of hunters as well. Where it starts to matter is at extended distances, farther than many actually typically shoot. No matter how good you are at judging wind, you will never be perfect, and it will always be a guess. So if your taking a shot at 900 yards, and you estimate the wind as 9 mph, but it is really 12 mph, a bullet with a high bc may mean you only miss the mark on the animal by 3.5", which keeps it in the vitals, where as a bullet with a low bc may mean you miss by 7". The difference in "room for error" is where bc really comes into play.

In reality, does it matter for the vast majority of people, even on this site, that set their personal max at 500ish yards, and their average shot is under 200? Unlikely. They could load a bullet with the bc of an ash tray and it wouldn't really matter. However, the minority that have an average harvest distance of 600-800 yards, with some taken over 1000, it absolutely makes a difference, so bc must be considered, and a low bc is in fact, a significant hindrance. Again, this is according to the current model used by shooters of KO2M, applied ballistics, etc., things could always change in the future.
 
Last edited:
Under the current understanding of BC being the determination of wind drift, to a point you are correct, and for the majority of hunters as well. Where it starts to matter is at extended distances, farther than many actually typically shoot. No matter how good you are at judging wind, you will never be perfect, and it will always be a guess. So if your taking a shot at 900 yards, and you estimate the wind as 9 mph, but it is really 12 mph, a bullet with a high bc may mean you only miss the mark on the animal by 3.5", which keeps it in the vitals, where as a bullet with a low bc may mean you miss by 7". The difference in "room for error" is where bc really comes into play.

In reality, does it matter for the vast majority of people, even on this site, that set their personal max at 500ish yards, and their average shot is under 200? Unlikely. They could load a bullet with the bc of an ash tray and it wouldn't really matter. However, the minority that have an average harvest distance of 600-800 yards, with some taken over 1000, it absolutely makes a difference, so bc must be considered, and a low bc is in fact, a significant hindrance. Again, this is according to the current model used by shooters of KO2M, applied ballistics, etc., things could always change in the future.
Assuming the bc calculation for wind drift is correct.
 
I ran the numbers at 867 yards with the velocities and yardage given. No suprise the numbers line up and are only about 1 click difference. 300 fps is a very large hole that the higher bc bullet has to dig its way out of.

I'm going to conduct my own testing on this theory that bc doesn't matter in the wind. I'm going to launch 2 bullets at the same velocity, same or comparable weight, but drastically different BC numbers. My theory is the higher bc bullet will drift less due to its less time in flight due to its better velocity retention.

I'm also going to test a light bullet, that has the same bc of a heavy bullet, and fire them at the same velocity. My goal is to just see how much weight plays a role in this.

You need either enough velocity to over come low bc, or you need high bc to over come a slower velocity. Its a balancing act of mixing both numbers to get yhe perfect formula for your situation. It seems pretty simple but I won't know until I do my own testing.
 
Last edited:
My theory is the higher bc bullet will drift less due to its less time in flight due to its better velocity retention.
Correct. A "better" projectile is the goal. I think…….
A better pill can be pushed faster with the same pressure, and function terminally very well, with more consistency. We all agree there are limits. The pursuit of perfection keeps us improving.
I've not done any wind tests. But it makes good sense to me, that the longer a projo is exposed to the lateral force of wind, the more it will be moved. That tells me time of flight is very important. So. Push it faster, gets there faster, until it doesn't.
At that point, we find ourselves in the thought process of improving something.
Increase speed, or increase BC?
 
Correct. A "better" projectile is the goal. I think…….
A better pill can be pushed faster with the same pressure, and function terminally very well, with more consistency. We all agree there are limits. The pursuit of perfection keeps us improving.
I've not done any wind tests. But it makes good sense to me, that the longer a projo is exposed to the lateral force of wind, the more it will be moved. That tells me time of flight is very important. So. Push it faster, gets there faster, until it doesn't.
At that point, we find ourselves in the thought process of improving something.
Increase speed, or increase BC?
I think it's a blend of bc, and speed. You can't have all of one and not the other. I've always been a middle of the road kinda guy and will likely stay there. I dont subscribe to extremes.
 
Apples to oranges. The Hammer has a 300 fps advantage.

Take a 200gr Berger and run it 300 fps faster than the Hammer and see what happens.

Shoot a 150gr round nose at the same velocity as a 150gr VLD and tell me BC doesn't have any advantages.

BC absolutely matters in LONG range hunting. To say otherwise is simply false.
 

Recent Posts

Top