Jimm
Well-Known Member
Important ?, yes!
To put in a nutshell what I have learned by hands on ,OK, here goes:
GM TEC ,yeah , I know , I 'm a ,whatever.
Side by side comparisons , over and over , let this one be first , then that one, follow up with the next one, ad naseum.
To modify this stance a smidgen I will say that after the gm tec failed to produce any further fouling the Barnes CR 10 would do a little bit , not much. Does anyone have any idea how much money GM spent to bring this product to the market place?
Yes , I know that it was not developed for shooters , but , hey take a look at Butches Bore Shine( same ingredients).
I have bought and tried them all ,my methods are not perfect but there is one thing sure , results are so far within a "corral " of results that I don't need further testing . I gave away the losers .
BTW, thanks to all of you here, my shooting is better now than it was 30 yrs. ago even though my vision is not as good as then. Jim B.
To put in a nutshell what I have learned by hands on ,OK, here goes:
GM TEC ,yeah , I know , I 'm a ,whatever.
Side by side comparisons , over and over , let this one be first , then that one, follow up with the next one, ad naseum.
To modify this stance a smidgen I will say that after the gm tec failed to produce any further fouling the Barnes CR 10 would do a little bit , not much. Does anyone have any idea how much money GM spent to bring this product to the market place?
Yes , I know that it was not developed for shooters , but , hey take a look at Butches Bore Shine( same ingredients).
I have bought and tried them all ,my methods are not perfect but there is one thing sure , results are so far within a "corral " of results that I don't need further testing . I gave away the losers .
BTW, thanks to all of you here, my shooting is better now than it was 30 yrs. ago even though my vision is not as good as then. Jim B.
