338 ocw opinions?

Kampfjager

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2019
Messages
190
Reaction score
112
City & State/Province
Kentucky
Hey guys, just did this ocw and this was my results..... thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 20210106_125159.jpg
    20210106_125159.jpg
    1,005.3 KB
That's a tough one. There almost no vertical at 88.7. But it looks like 89.5 to 90.1 grouped in the same general area and in similar fashion. Were it me, I'd prolly load up around 89.8 and play with seating depth to see if I could get the groups to tighten up a little bit.
 
What did you use for COL/CBTO?

I agree with working seating depth around 89.8, but I'd also load 5x at 88.7 just to see if it that speed was an oddity.
 
That's a tough one. There almost no vertical at 88.7. But it looks like 89.5 to 90.1 grouped in the same general area and in similar fashion. Were it me, I'd prolly load up around 89.8 and play with seating depth to see if I could get the groups to tighten up a little bit.
Exactly what I was thinking, sir..... thank ya
 
Yeah have any numbers for these groups? Speed and standard deviation?
No velocities yet, ill get velocities once my node is found..... I use a magnetospeed and that alters group size and poi...... so me getting velocities while running an ocw would show a false reading...
 
What did you use for COL/CBTO?

I agree with working seating depth around 89.8, but I'd also load 5x at 88.7 just to see if it that speed was an oddity.
I will have to get those lengths to ya..... they are sized to the magazine which sets it at 0.060" jump
 
If you did not run into pressure I would go a little further and see what happens, If you did blackdirt is on the money
 
It looks like it's starting to come together go a little higher if you're not seeing pressure signs
I'm not seeing pressure signs, so yes I can go higher.... but is there a trade off?..... throat erosion, temperature instability, etc ?
 

Recent Posts

Back
Top