300 wsm or 6.5 prc

Discussion in 'Long Range Hunting & Shooting' started by baskhunter, Aug 16, 2019.

Help Support Long Range Hunting by donating:

  1. highdrum

    highdrum Well-Known Member

    Nov 30, 2008
    I was under this same decision lately, building a light weight Tikka for mountain hunting. I went with a long action donor, a Mesa altitude stock, hells canyon 23" summit carbon barrel. I pondered caliber for a month. Will us this rifle to hunt steep/dense country from a backpack 90% the time. I wanted knockdown power. I was torn between 7 Saum or 300wsm. After much debate I went 300. Build is still in progress, but it'll be throated with 230fb to shoot 215 Bergers and the heavy eldm line. Should manage 2850+ fps with rl26. That's a lot of juice for a handy 6# rifle. It'll kick like hell in sure, but looking forward to getting it on the range.
    tmfisher57, GoosePilot and CO_Guy like this.
  2. CO_Guy

    CO_Guy Well-Known Member

    Nov 16, 2018
    My Tikka T3 Lite T3 in 338WM is about 6.4lb stock, as all T3s are and even light as a feather, it shoots super smoothly. I have zero flinch with that rifle.
  3. Web1350

    Web1350 Well-Known Member

    May 2, 2019
    Maybe you're the one that can't handle recoil, advocating a 6.5 for any animal on the planet. Sure, small calibers have killed big animals but as we all know, its bullet placement. Anyone doing so is either a fool or has a death wish plus these animals need to be killed humanely.
  4. dm406

    dm406 Member

    Jan 3, 2019
    Yes Sir they work quite well
    436 and CO_Guy like this.
  5. coop2564

    coop2564 Well-Known Member

    Jan 6, 2015
    Both would work but the 300wsm would work better in this case.
    just country likes this.
  6. nvschütze

    nvschütze Well-Known Member

    Aug 5, 2019
    Go with the 300WSM; you already have a proven barrel. New barrels are in excess of $300, after which you have to have them installed. That's another three bills. Then there's the time factor. Months and months to have the 6.5mm made. Get the 300WSM rocking, then take your time to build-out a really snazzy 6.5mm just the way you want it...
    Huntz likes this.
  7. nvschütze

    nvschütze Well-Known Member

    Aug 5, 2019
    I went back to the start of this thread to see how old it is. I saw Another Casual's avatar (Post #7). He's obviously seen Hitchcock's "Psycho" too many times. Mr. Casual has a fine sense of humor...
    Another Casual likes this.
  8. B-LOT Banga

    B-LOT Banga Well-Known Member LRH Team Member

    Aug 11, 2018
    I have both the 300 wsm and 6.5 PRC... I’ve witnessed my 300 wsm 200 grain eldx kill faster with more damage than any animal I ever shot with my 6.5 PRC with 140 grain Berger VLD’s. Even if the shot wasn’t ideal the animal still died almost instantly as with my 6.5 PRC I had to chase a couple animals good distances. I will admit it was mostly due to shooter error but nevertheless the 30 caliber will always be more violent and pack a bigger punch worth the cost of recoil. Good luck with your decision!!
    dougduey likes this.
  9. just country

    just country Well-Known Member

    Aug 6, 2014
    morning, more 6.5 mania. the WSM is way better
    cartridge. justme gbot tum
    Web1350 likes this.
  10. PBR driver

    PBR driver Well-Known Member

    Oct 14, 2009
    Yes Elk are tough animals but if it was me I would carry the rifle I shot the best, here in Western Wyoming a lot of both Elk and Moose are killed cleanly with the .243 Winchester and the lowly .30-30, there is no real need to shoot long range unless you feel you need to.
    The .25-06, 30-06, 7-08, 7x57, 6.5x55,.280,.270 .308 and so on, then if one feels under gunned the .264 @ 7mag will work wonders.
    Be careful not to over gun yourself.
    If you hunt whitetails back home, that rifle will work here on Elk as long as you keep your range conservative and your shot placement is spot on.
    In the words of Eugene Stoner, "Killing power has to do with three things, these three things are , #1-shot placement, #2- shot placement, and #3- is shot placement, and I will had bullet performance.
    A solid hit in the vitals from a .243 is much better than a marginal hit from a .300 WSM or other magnum cartridge.
    djm670, Huntz and tmmcampbell like this.
  11. Coyote_Hunter

    Coyote_Hunter Active Member

    Jul 24, 2019
    There is no doubt a 6.5PRC can take elk cleanly - I've been doing it since 1982 with a 7mm.

    That said, I prefer my .300WM to my 7mm RM for elk. I use heavily constructed bullets in both (North Fork SS and Barnes TTSX and LRX) and both have provided reliable exits on broadsides and both bullet types have gone the length of mule deer. I just like to heavier bullets I use in the .300 for elk. Probably a mental thing because the 7mm kills them just as quickly.
    tmmcampbell likes this.