300 Norma Mag Improved. Follow along!!!

Are you running Mil's or MOA?

Off topic but I'm considering swapping from MOA to Mil's with finer adjustments in the future.
 
Are you running Mil's or MOA?

Off topic but I'm considering swapping from MOA to Mil's with finer adjustments in the future.
I just recently started using Mils because the scope I wanted only came in MILS lol. But it is a more coarse adjustment compared to MOA. Rough comparison is .36" per click with mils and .25" per click with MOA.
 
Well here's the results from my pressure test with hBN coated 245 Berger's. Started to find pressure at 91 and 92 had a cratered primer and a good ejector mark but bolt lift was normal. Target was shot at 300 and that's an 1.5" dot.
88.5 velocity was 2940 not the 2990 that it looks like. Lol
0C59F9DB-F8D3-4D9E-8856-5B0CD1A48F52.jpeg
C864570C-E37D-461A-9616-2E06B698B19B.jpeg
 
Last edited:
While here's the results from my pressure test. Started to find pressure at 91 and 92 had a cratered primer and a good ejector mark but bolt lift was normal. Target was shot at 300 and that's an 1.5" dot.
88.5 velocity was 2940 not the 2990 that it looks like. Lol View attachment 390324View attachment 390325
Good data! What do you think you're going to go with for the next outing?
 
Today results. 88.7 and 90.2 showed the most promise. Except the ES's were horrible across the board, I think it's because I was shooting once fired and it wasn't fully formed yet or that's what I'm chalking it up to. ES on 88.7 was 45 and 90.2 was 27. Groups shot at 300 yards.
90.2 grains I made a .5 moa height adjustment after the first round (highest in that group). Measured group from the "+" mark.
46260031-E553-4B80-9164-9743F2B185AD.jpeg
9689D00E-6D78-4C9C-8421-77BA3098957C.jpeg
 
Top