270wsm velocity trouble

And you feel that it's your duty to interject and devalue my post ?

I think you're just looking to troll me a bit so maybe you should share your personal experience with the 270 WSM and we can all benefit from your vast knowledge on the subject.
No not trolling didn't mean to offend you or anyone I load alot of caliber rifle. But by far not a expert. And lots of people have helped me on here .I m really trying to get close even though I know it will not mot match 270 weatherby which I have. But if I could get close which I have seen done. Its a very light and handy rifle my health is failing running on very limited time that I might could use that rifle and still have close to the performance that I like. While I can but if I offended u I apologize
 
No not trolling didn't mean to offend you or anyone I load alot of caliber rifle. But by far not an expert. And lots of people have helped me on here .I m really trying to get close even though I know it will not mot match 270 weatherby which I have. But if I could get close which I have seen done. It's a very light and handy rifle my health is failing running on very limited time that I might could use that rifle and still have close to the performance that I like. While I can but if I offended u I apologize
I wasn't referring to you sir, my rebuttal was to the peckerhead guy that finds it his duty to troll me lately.
My apologies as well.
 
I've had 2 different 270WSM's and tried many different bullet weights including 140's! I was happy with 3100 out of both in that weight using H1000! I always felt accuracy was always more important than absolute maximum velocity!
With that velocity being representative of H1000, then it tells me there are multiple powders that will get another 50fps. Others, 75 or maybe more, just depends on what you want.
The action length handicap is hard to overcome, though. Deep seated bullets take up valuable space that remove the top end of performance, normally.
Part of the reason me and SAAMI had a nasty break-up.
 
Results would have being the same with any 140 AB bullet shot at that speed with a 6.5 or 27 or 7 mm cal cartridge
That error does not make the 270wsm any better cartridge then others 🤷‍♂️
Fast-driven Accubonds have a real history of death, expansion AND penetration. Makes me wonder why I've looked beyond them!
 
I got a winchester 270wsm 24 inch barrel using hornady brass and lots of 140 grain bullets. That said on powder I have tried ramshot magnum,imr 7828 reg cut and ssc , magpro, according to nosler manual I should be getting 3200 to around 3250 . Peak pressure is can barely get 3150 with slight ejector mark. Tried 130s 3200 was peak .any suggestions on what to try to gain more velocity
I found your problem...
 
Update i was wrong got to looking at mag length i didn't measure but it can length out the bullet very lil don't think it will help. And also got to looking at my velocity from my chronograph its not 3150 it's 3071 fps with 140 and like 3180 with 130 and that was with magpro. And ramshot grand came in 2nd
 
Every barrel, chamber, brass (and bolt strength) is a bit different, but I had good results with 129 gr barnes LRX over StaBALL6.5 with Rem brass and Rem Mag primer. Good accuracy and 3,340 FPS.

Model 70 Black Shadow w/24" bbl. I have harvested deer with this rifle, but not with this load (yet).
 
I think your brass might be soft.

We have a lot of Winchester brass.

Never any pressure signs at book max loads, any bullet, any powder. We have 2 rifles and still using brass after 5 firings.
 
Back
Top