Hunting Rifle: Anyone Else Have No Desire for a Silencer?

You're missing (ignoring) the part where stated individuals can and will sue the establishment for injuries resulting from preventable bodily harm...and win...in a court presided over by a government-appointed judge.

And the resulting punishment can and will be enforced by the government.

You are trying to argue that I am "technically" wrong from a standpoint that I've never taken...yet still a point on which I've immediately conceded. The concept that you purposefully seem to be neglecting is that if something is "practically" enforced indirectly, is it not just "enforced?"

In another scenario, if the establishment requires PPE to enter and you refuse, they will have security escort you from the premises. To me, and most others, that is very much a real enforcement of OSHA regulations onto those not covered under the "occupation."

But I know you know this. Which goes back to my "good faith" statement earlier.
"Technically" you are wrong on your standpoint. There is no enforcement of OSHA standards to the public implied or otherwise. EVER. If one company aligns its policies for visitors with OSHA standards it's not the same as OSHA enforcing WORKPLACE standards. I'm sorry if you cannot accept this.


If you care to continue PM me


Back to the OP.

My apologies.
 
Last edited:
Last year at hunting camp, a guy had a silencer. Every time before he got on his horse, he'd pull it off. And then when he got off, he'd screw it back on because the thing wouldn't fit in his scabbard. I wear the Cadillac of hearing protecting with ESP. No need for a silencer or the hassle.
To be fair, it sounds like the guy has not put an iota of thought into his hunting gear, as a silencer is less hassle than any ear pro in a hunting scenario.

I don't think I've ever removed my silencer from my hunting rifle from the moment I put it on. Goes in and out of my scabbard and cases without issue...and it weighs less than true ear pro and I don't have to remember to put them on in the 10 seconds I may have to shoot.
 
Last year at hunting camp, a guy had a silencer. Every time before he got on his horse, he'd pull it off. And then when he got off, he'd screw it back on because the thing wouldn't fit in his scabbard. I wear the Cadillac of hearing protecting with ESP. No need for a silencer or the hassle.
My scabbard made by Murray Leather fits my suppressor attached hunting rifles perfectly . I hunt off of horses a lot and have no troubles.
 
I might be reversing my previous stance on suppressors while hunting, at least for coyotes. I'd still try to use ear pro due to my hearing loss. But having a suppressor might help preserve what hearing I have left.
Who needs hearing hahaha. I can totally see this for varmint style stuff! For me it may be the only place a supressor makes the most sense.
 
Who needs hearing hahaha. I can totally see this for varmint style stuff! For me it may be the only place a supressor makes the most sense.
I'd have a suppressor for home defense first, and then for hunting. My hearing is so damaged from the Army that loud noises are now painful for me.
 
You're missing (ignoring) the part where stated individuals can and will sue the establishment for injuries resulting from preventable bodily harm...and win...in a court presided over by a government-appointed judge.

And the resulting punishment can and will be enforced by the government.
Even a fair defense lawyer would win this. How could some go to a gun range without some reasonable expectations that they are going to be exposed to loud noises?

You're from California or Oregon, right?
 
Last edited:
My scabbard made by Murray Leather fits my suppressor attached hunting rifles perfectly . I hunt off of horses a lot and have no troubles.

I've been on 16 guided horseback hunts. Have yet to see an outfitter that provides a scabbard for rifles with silencers. I bring my own scabbard and saddle bags when I go. He obviously didn't.
 
To be fair, it sounds like the guy has not put an iota of thought into his hunting gear, as a silencer is less hassle than any ear pro in a hunting scenario.

I don't think I've ever removed my silencer from my hunting rifle from the moment I put it on. Goes in and out of my scabbard and cases without issue...and it weighs less than true ear pro and I don't have to remember to put them on in the 10 seconds I may have to shoot.
I've been on 16 guided horseback hunts. Have yet to see an outfitter that provides a scabbard for rifles with silencers. I bring my own scabbard and saddle bags when I go. He obviously didn't. Guessing you're not familiar with ESP hearing protection. They go in when I start the hunt in the morning and they come off at the end of the day. No different than the hearing aids I wear.
 
When I grow up, I will have a nice 404 or 416 or some cool African rifle that is too pretty to thread for a can.

The rest of my guns will wear cans.
 
I realize we are way off topic, but what happens if a visitor resides in a location with known slip hazards present, and they are not made aware of, nor provided the proper equipment to safely work in said area and they slip on concrete?

What happens if they get on a ladder or lift and are not "heavily suggested" to wear a harness, then take a fall?

What happens if an individual is allowed to continuously shoot at a range without earpro, and he learns he has experience significant hearing loss year-over-year?
It's a known risk, like choosing to drive after freezing rain. That's on the individual.
You were given a brain. Use it.
 
I've been on 16 guided horseback hunts. Have yet to see an outfitter that provides a scabbard for rifles with silencers. I bring my own scabbard and saddle bags when I go. He obviously didn't.
Yep and that's why i have my own and have sent many customers his way just for that reason..

I would think guides would encourage it more and more, and supply a quality scabbard that will handle either..
 
Back
Top