Yep, sure do. And I wouldn't run it in my garage with the doors closed. Is this an argument for electric cars?
Lead Poisoning
- Thread starter ButterBean
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
I make it my policy to avoid commenting on posts initiated by sponsors, whether badlands, Apex, hammers or cameraland?. I have had bad experience. But are you saying that if someone initiates a post, only those that agreeing with it can comment?
Just want to know if this is a new rule
Just want to know if this is a new rule
..and I still use lead bullets.
xsn10s
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Messages
- 7,367
Sure go ahead and buy an EV. Biden will probably give you a rebate.Yep, sure do. And I wouldn't run it in my garage with the doors closed. Is this an argument for electric cars?
Read above.
Let me know when you get one and maybe I'll join ya. Gotta tell you they are fun to drive though. Never had that experience but my son tried one out. Super quick. Just battery life sucks for long drives.
I'd love to know this too. He's been busy this morning and likely didn't see it... That's a lot of crack for a 199 out of the Rum for sure.
I read all pages, thats why I had to ask. And with that, I am unfollowing this
xsn10s
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Messages
- 7,367
No thank you. I won't buy one as I don't see EV's as a viable alternative at this time.
xsn10s
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Messages
- 7,367
Anyways back to the video that Steve tagged me to. He never answered my questions about which manufacturer was the leading competitor's bullet. Or the paper clip used. I'd also like to know both loads and velocities. He stated in the video that the 199 gr HH was going at 3460 fps. I find that amazing since Weatherby's 30-338 wby mag velocity with the 195 Hammer is published at 3225 fps. The I would expect 30-338 WBY Mag to have more capacity and thus higher velocities. As I found on Hodgdon's load data comparing the 300 RUM to the 30-338 Wby mag. No need to reply Northkill. I'll respectfuly ask that you leave that between me and Steve.
This...
My very last comment and only because I was quoted. Read the very first sentense on #133
I for one, am about choices, and availabilty.
Cheers
Ucsdryder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2016
- Messages
- 1,571
When you call someone out in public then refuse to engage…you could have sent me a PM to tell me your thoughts as well. Remember all of this goes both ways.I'm not trying to ignore you. Just think over it a little. Feel free to PM me sometime on it if you still would like to hear my observations so we don't have to continue this here on someone else's thread.
Yes it does go both ways. I have engaged privately on this premise at times, but I think there's a place to call something out in public that was expressed in public. However, in this case the rules post was a caution and not a statement, and more for everyone (including those who "
" and "
" the post) than it was for you. There are others who have an agenda that you may not. The post was feeding it though you likely didn't intend it that way. I don't think you were out of line so much yourself. Hopefully that makes sense. 
Yep, it all fits together if you get the point being made in fairness to the context. And I'm with you on options and availability. Yes sir.
