I don't care what bullet anyone shoots but I found this very interesting, I would have never thought about what was found here
I see this as a different approach towards banning firearms. One of the reasons we have firearms is for hunting. Make hunting too expensive and the numbers behind hunting diminishes. Once that happens the reason to legally own firearms vanishes. That's my opinion.This is old news really. The MRCC is actually one of the good organizations in this state. My roommates and I would donate meat scraps for the birds while I was in college. There don't appear to be obvious ties to anti-2A groups. However, that doesn't stop the anti-2A crowd from exploiting information like this, which is unfortunate.
Non-lead bullets will be next on the bad list if legislation is ever passed banning lead.
This is true only if you believe the 2nd Amendment to be exclusive to hunting.I see this as a different approach towards banning firearms. One of the reasons we have firearms is for hunting. Make hunting too expensive and the numbers behind hunting diminishes. Once that happens the reason to legally own firearms vanishes. That's my opinion.
Yup exactly.This is true only if you believe the 2nd Amendment to be exclusive to hunting.
It might be over-sensationalized, but can we say it's all BS without offering our own conclusive counter-science/proof? I doubt anyone on here would be so confident of their position of denial that they'd intentionally ingest lead to make a public point. There's a reason steel shot is required for waterfowl.Yep!