Official Hammer bullets Terminal Performance (picture heavy)

We do expect the petals to shed. We don't always get exactly what we want, but usually do. The current supply of copper is very consistently shedding to our expectations. We now have about a years worth of copper on hand. No worries about consistency in the future.
 

Attachments

  • 20221119_083616.jpg
    20221119_083616.jpg
    903.7 KB · Views: 143
Cleaned it up and looked closer today. Looks like only 1 pedal shed. The one i found. Other 2 peeled back as you see in your blown up pic. Its the 155. Out of a 28SM with a mv of 3430
So 28 Sherman mag, 8 twist, 155 either absolute hammer or hammer hunter, which needs an 8.5 or 8.75 twist respectively, muzzle velocity of 3430, impact velocity of 1951 fps, I would think it would be stable at any elevation. Was there any debris or limbs/branches in the way?
 
So 28 Sherman mag, 8 twist, 155 either absolute hammer or hammer hunter, which needs an 8.5 or 8.75 twist respectively, muzzle velocity of 3430, impact velocity of 1951 fps, I would think it would be stable at any elevation. Was there any debris or limbs/branches in the way?
Nope wide open country. Entrance hole was tiny. I was happy with the performance now you guys are making me second guess it. 155HH
 
Nope wide open country. Entrance hole was tiny. I was happy with the performance now you guys are making me second guess it. 155HH
So bottom line means the bullet failed to perform, *as it is intended*.....bullet was stable at impact, and there was no good reason for it to do what it did, HOWEVER....bullet failures happen, with every manufacturer, none of them are immune, so look at the end result.....very effective, very dead animal. No reason to second guess it unless you are wanting something different from external ballistics out of the bullet. Documented performance like that from these bullets is the minority, not the majority, as are bullet failures with many other manufacturers. I would keep note of it, and if another one fails, maybe add more weight to it, but I wouldn't give up on them at this point. When I test badlands, Hammers, bergers, Hornady's, Noslers, or any other bullets, as far as terminal performance, I look at end result. First, (assuming a good hit) how quickly did the animal die, and second, how much meat loss was there. External ballistics is another subject.
 
Last edited:
Here's the exit side on a whitetail that was hit at 501yds with a 124H shot from a 6.5PRC at 3,200 fps. It looks like the petals stayed close to the shank and left an impressive exit hole. Surprisingly enough, the deer got about 60 yds before piling up. There was good blood sign starting right from the hit.
Whitetail-Hammer.jpg
 
Last edited:
So bottom line means the bullet failed to perform, *as it is intended*.....bullet was stable at impact, and there was no good reason for it to do what it did, HOWEVER....bullet failures happen, with every manufacturer, none of them are immune, so look at the end result.....very effective, very dead animal. No reason to second guess it unless you are wanting something different from external ballistics out of the bullet. Documented performance like that from these bullets is the minority, not the majority, as are bullet failures with many other manufacturers. I would keep note of it, and if another one fails, maybe add more weight to it, but I wouldn't give up on them at this point. When I test badlands, Hammers, bergers, Hornady's, Noslers, or any other bullets, as far as terminal performance, I look at end result. First, (assuming a good hit) how quickly did the animal die, and second, how much meat loss was there. External ballistics is another subject.
The only other possibility could be a damaged meplat from hitting the feed ramp hard or had been dinged up from a drop or something.
 
Top