Sierra MK's Ballistic Coeffecient: The Truth Wanted

Nodak7mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2001
Messages
181
Location
N. Dakota
Sierra MK\'s Ballistic Coeffecient: The Truth Wanted

Gentlemen;

Experiencing confusion! Gonna build a LR critter getter using high BC bullets. I want to use Sierra MK's in either 6.5 or 7mm. Now I have read several diferent documents that post the 7mm 168gr MK's BC @ .633 & .627 and I believe my Oehler Ballistic x-plorer gives a .633, yet at the Sierra website they give only .488 for that bullet. Is that a misprint? Anyone got the true answer to that? (I intend on calling the Sierra tech line on Monday, but can't wait)

Gonna build either 6.5-06 Imp or a .280 Imp based on the higher BC. I am determined to use MK's as Primary bullet due to reputation, $$$ & availbility. I am aware of very high BC VLD's, but don't want to go there.

Any help?

Nodak7mm
 

Dan Conzo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2001
Messages
127
Location
Nanty-Glo, Pennsylvania
Re: Sierra MK\'s Ballistic Coeffecient: The Truth Wanted

Sierra had bad equipment when they first came out with the 7mm 168 MK and made an error in the B.C. They corrected it later on to .488. But the 168 MK does a great job at 1000 yds benchrest or deer. A overlooked bullet in 7mm is the 175 Sierra B.T. Spitzer, it has a B.C. of over .530 and is almost as accurate and kills good too, especially if you get it going about 3100 fps.
 

Len Backus

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 2, 2001
Messages
6,714
Re: Sierra MK\'s Ballistic Coeffecient: The Truth Wanted

I did some limited tests just before my Mexico Coues deer hunt last month with the 7mm, 168 grain MK. I think the .488 BC is about right.
 

Tommy Vaughan

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2002
Messages
18
Location
Minnesota
Re: Sierra MK\'s Ballistic Coeffecient: The Truth Wanted

Is there any experience with the 150grain, 7mm Swift Scirocco yet, with an advertised BC of .53? Based on balistics tables, this BC combined with the increased muzzle velocity of the lighter bullet make it look very competitive with other heavier 7mm out to a 1000 yards and further. Is it accurate? or another X bullet?
 

Varmint Hunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2001
Messages
3,246
Location
Long Island, New York
Re: Sierra MK\'s Ballistic Coeffecient: The Truth Wanted

I have experimented a bit with the 150 Scirrocco in an accurized 7STW. Although it does shoot well for a "premium" hunting bullet, it was regularely outshot by Nosler B-Tips and Hornady SST's. One could naturally assume that a quality "match" bullet would shoot better yet.
 

Trending threads

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top