jlvandersnick
Well-Known Member
I see a lot of used Nightforce scopes with the NP-R1 reticle for sale. I do know the reticle has been discontinued by nightforce. Does anyone have any thoughts as to why the reticle is not very popular.
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
NP-R1 reticle thoughts
- Thread starter jlvandersnick
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Canadian Bushman
Well-Known Member
I love it. I have two nightforce scopes, both with the NP-R1 reticle. I literally have zero complaints.
StrutNut
Well-Known Member
I thought I answered this post but I didnt see my response so lets try this again. I have one and really like it. I have no complaints. Its simple and works.
I have one also and really like it. I don't know why they discontinued it.
SavageShtr
Well-Known Member
I also have one with the NP-R1 reticle and love it. I wish all my scopes had it. Though I only own one Nightforce.
Autorotate19
Well-Known Member
I have one and really like it. The only downfall I see is that each windage hash is 2 moa instead of marks for each moa but its not a big deal.
jlvandersnick
Well-Known Member
thank you for all of your thoughts. I am looking for something that will ultimately be used for hunting. I am currently using Leupold Mark 4's
I have since learned that the reticle "lines" are thinner than some. Equivalent to the MOAR T, versus what is in the MOAR.
Do any of you have trouble seeing the reticle in low light conditions? I'm 57 and my eyes really struggle in low light.
again thank you so much for your time.
I have since learned that the reticle "lines" are thinner than some. Equivalent to the MOAR T, versus what is in the MOAR.
Do any of you have trouble seeing the reticle in low light conditions? I'm 57 and my eyes really struggle in low light.
again thank you so much for your time.
Canadian Bushman
Well-Known Member
Yeah the np-r1 is hard to see at dusk, but if you set the illumination correctly the solution is just a click away.
Stugots
Well-Known Member
I have an ATACR 5-25x56 enhanced with the MOAR-T reticle and a friend who owns a NF with the NP-R1 reticle. I have shot his rifle and as I recall, the NP-R1 reticle MOA lines and vert. & horizontal lines were 'heavier' that those in my ATACR.
Capt. D
Well-Known Member
I have one NP R1 and one MOAR reticle. I like the NP R1 a lot but really like the floating cross hair in the MOAR. My thought for the discontinuance of the NP R1 is likely the popularity of the MOAR. I think that, at least with the people I know, the NP R1 was very popular until the MOAR reticle was introduced.
Autorotate19
Well-Known Member
Yes it can be hard to see in low light but it's a catch 22 fine reticle for precise long range shooting or thicker reticle for low light. I would say go thinner and get illumination. I'm on the other side of the fence I don't care for the floating crosshair on the moar.
dmj
Well-Known Member
I currently have this reticle on my go hunting rifle. I'm 66 and have old eyes that do struggle, especially in low light. At first I didn't think I was going to like the reticle and was second guessing my decision in purchasing the scope. But didn't fell I could afford new so purchased this one used and felt it was a decent buy. After getting use to it and using it along with being able to illuminate it if needed I have gotten so I like it quite well. If and when I can afford to look for another scope I sure wouldn't be afraid to purchase another one with a NP-R1 reticle. This is my 2 cents worth and not sure if it's much help to you. Have a great day.
blackdog
Well-Known Member
Count me in as another NP-R1 lover! I've got two and see no need to change
Not true! the NPR1 reticle is .062 vs the MOAR-T in the ATACR at .065 while the original MOAR was a thick .140.
Not true! the NPR1 reticle is .062 vs the MOAR-T in the ATACR at .065 while the original MOAR was a thick .140.
