Norma MRP Shooters

Idaho Trecker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
1,403
Location
North Idaho
I have been working on loads for my 300 Sherman Shortmag and have had the best results with RL 22 which has me curious about MRP since RL 22 is supposed to be MRP seconds. I have bought a LOT of powders to test in this cartridge and am running low on funds at the rate I have been buying so I thought I'd ask some questions to see if it is worth buying MRP.

I did a search here and saw most have said it is not temp sensitive but all the threads are old.

How have you found MRP to be in regards to temp sensitivity?

How does the grain size and density compare to RL22?

How is lot to lot consistency?

Thanks in advance
 
It's been a while since I've used R22 so I can't comment on the grain size difference. I've also only used one lot so can't help there either. However, I've run it over the chronograph with the same lot of reloads at 10 degree differences. Dropping 10 degrees dropped 10 fps. According to my Strelok program it's a .5% difference. I've got nothing to compare that to, though, to say whether that's good or not.

I had a conversation with the head ballistician at Swift bullets a few months ago. He told me that he's tried most all the powders out there to see how they differ in temperature sensitivity. He's conclusion was that they're all temperature sensitive no matter how they're advertised. Take that for whatever it's worth.
 
I don't know about temperature, but will chime in anyway.

I have a .375 wildcat. When I could get MRP it would fire 100 grains to get 300 grainers to an even 3,000 feet per second. When it disappeared I got some RL22. I heard it was the same so worked up a load with it. It would not get there. I fired enough to know I had to stop at 98.0 grains. The velocity was 2,990 feet per second.
 
Wildcater, That helps alot hearing that. It sounds like MRP may work for me then. Can you tell me how similar the grain size/density of MRP is when compared to RL 22?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top