I shot two deer in Nebraska this November using 120 grain Barnes TTSX bullets out of my 260 Rem..I have become a great fan of the Nosler Accubond bullets for deer at various ranges out to 400 yards. My hunting friends mostly shoot Accubonds out of different rifles, from 260 Rem, 270 Win, 280 Rem, and my 7mmSAum. This year I wanted to see how the TTSX compared, so I loaded my 260 Rem with 44 grains of RL-17, in RP cases and WLR primers. This load averaged 2920 ft/sec across my CED chronograph.
The first deer I shot an average buck at 80 yards took off at the shot and ran about 50 yards before piling up. When I examined the deer I found that the shot was almost perfect, I took off the top of the heart. There was blood on the ground on the off side of the shot and there was a large blood trail. Everything looked great, but I did not see as much tissue damage as I expected at this distance and with the velocity of this load.
My second deer was a doe and I shot her at just under 200 yard and she ran 50 plus yards and stood in a great deal of hurt. I shot a second round and took out both shoulders at about 240 yards.
When I looked at this deer I found that my first shot was a little further back than I would have wanted but it was a killing shot. I think an Accubond would have done more damage.
What did I learn from this? The Barnes bullets do not seem to do as much tissue damage as the Nosler Accubonds do. The load I used could be used on much larger animals than 150-200 lbs deer.