I'm building a new long range sheep/deer rifle and I've been checking out a lot of scopes. I haven't found anything that quite matches what I'm looking for, so I'm sort of wondering if maybe it's just not possible. Basically I'd like a tactical style scope that doesn't weigh too much.
1) weight near or under 20 oz.
2) First Focal Place (FFP)
3) low magnification in the 3 to 4 range and high magnification in the 18 to 24
4) flawless and repeatable tracking and return to zero
5) turrets are short (or at least not too tall), and either capped or locking (capped windage and locking elevation might be ideal)
6) a hold-over and hold-off (tree-style) reticle with either 1/4 MOA or .2 mil subtensions, matching units with the turrets (MOA/MOA or mil/mil)
7) tough enough to handle backpack hunting
8) Above average to excellent glass (good enough for long range work)
9) price under $1500
A zero stop and rotation counter would be nice too, but not a total deal breaker.
Not all of these are required to be a good long range hunting scope, but for me, this would be the "no compromise" LRH scope. For example I plan to dial for elevation but want the option of holding off for elevation and windage if time is short (why NOT have both options?) I'll be backpacking this rifle for DAYS so weight is a big minus, as are tall turrets, especially non-locking ones.
The March 3-24 comes very close, but it's more than I can afford. The new Athlon scopes are definitely in the running, but they are either heavy or SFP, and lack zero stops. The Leupold VX6 3-18 scopes are excellent glass, light weight, and plenty tough but they are SFP and don't offer much in the way of a tree-style reticle. The Burris Veracity is a great scope too, but it's a bit heavy.
The Vortex Viper HS LR with the XLR reticle is about the closest I've seen, and I may end up with one of those. I really wish they would do a FFP 3-18 or 4-20 version of the Razor HD LH with the XLR reticle. Bam. All the boxes ticked.
It seems like all the pieces are there, in one scope or another, and now all it takes is to put them all into one PERFECT LRH/tactical scope (for me, but I suspect others, especially tactical shooters who use their skills for hunting, would love it too.) But would it HAVE to weigh more than 20oz, or cost more than $1500, be SFP, or be too whimpy to hunt with? Is this a pick three out of four situation?
1) weight near or under 20 oz.
2) First Focal Place (FFP)
3) low magnification in the 3 to 4 range and high magnification in the 18 to 24
4) flawless and repeatable tracking and return to zero
5) turrets are short (or at least not too tall), and either capped or locking (capped windage and locking elevation might be ideal)
6) a hold-over and hold-off (tree-style) reticle with either 1/4 MOA or .2 mil subtensions, matching units with the turrets (MOA/MOA or mil/mil)
7) tough enough to handle backpack hunting
8) Above average to excellent glass (good enough for long range work)
9) price under $1500
A zero stop and rotation counter would be nice too, but not a total deal breaker.
Not all of these are required to be a good long range hunting scope, but for me, this would be the "no compromise" LRH scope. For example I plan to dial for elevation but want the option of holding off for elevation and windage if time is short (why NOT have both options?) I'll be backpacking this rifle for DAYS so weight is a big minus, as are tall turrets, especially non-locking ones.
The March 3-24 comes very close, but it's more than I can afford. The new Athlon scopes are definitely in the running, but they are either heavy or SFP, and lack zero stops. The Leupold VX6 3-18 scopes are excellent glass, light weight, and plenty tough but they are SFP and don't offer much in the way of a tree-style reticle. The Burris Veracity is a great scope too, but it's a bit heavy.
The Vortex Viper HS LR with the XLR reticle is about the closest I've seen, and I may end up with one of those. I really wish they would do a FFP 3-18 or 4-20 version of the Razor HD LH with the XLR reticle. Bam. All the boxes ticked.
It seems like all the pieces are there, in one scope or another, and now all it takes is to put them all into one PERFECT LRH/tactical scope (for me, but I suspect others, especially tactical shooters who use their skills for hunting, would love it too.) But would it HAVE to weigh more than 20oz, or cost more than $1500, be SFP, or be too whimpy to hunt with? Is this a pick three out of four situation?