ar15 in 243wssm or ar10 in 243?

R

Ring

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
266
Location
USA, ohio
looking for a 800y+ varmiter...
both are the same price, 1k

the ar10 is 1in10, the ar15 i can get in 1-8 or 1-9

ar10 mags would be cheaper and easy to find, the wssm would be custom and 35$ each.
 
trebark

trebark

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
3,560
Location
Falls Church, VA
Seems like an either/or type of choice. So it would depend on what you want. Here are my initial thoughts.

AR10 in 243win - with a 10 twist barrel the heaviest bullet you can shoot is about 90 grains. That's a larger enough bullet to kill deer if you decide to go dual purpose. Also, the 243win is not a barrel burner.

AR15 in 243wssm - with an 8 or 9 twist, you can shoot the 105grain bullets. The wssm though is a bit of a barrel burner.

If it was mine, I would choose the AR10.
 
D

distantfoe

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
334
Location
El Reno,Ok.
I had the same problem. I went with the 243 wssm in the ar15 frame for the significant price and weight difference. (Went with a dtech upper with select shillen barrel for ~$900 and a rock river complete lower ~$300. The rifle's primary use will be coyotes, so the weight was definately a priority. One thing about the wssm is the magazine will limit you c.o.l. with longer bullets.

Not sure why everyone thinks the wssm will be any more of a barrel burner than the winchester. Shoots virtually the same amount of powder.
 
O

Orddy

Active Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
42
Not sure why everyone thinks the wssm will be any more of a barrel burner than the winchester. Shoots virtually the same amount of powder.


Those that believe it is.......never have owned on and like too talk smack......
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
0
Views
1K
bigduck73
B
Iron Worker
Replies
2
Views
3K
1984nitro
1984nitro
D
Replies
6
Views
6K
strombeckj
S
Top